Aave Governance Conflict Widens Over $10 Million Revenue Dispute
Aave DAO members argue the interface change was made without approval and amounts to a quiet privatization of DAO-funded brand value.
A dispute over revenue sharing has erupted between the community governing DeFi lender Aave and its primary development firm, Aave Labs.
The conflict centers on Aave Labs’ recent decision to integrate CoW Swap as the underlying infrastructure for trading on the protocol’s primary website. The switch replaced ParaSwap, a previous integration that generated referral fees for the Aave DAO treasury.
DAO Members Question Economic Fallout From Interface Update
Governance delegates say the change has cut off a revenue stream of about $200,000 per week. On an annualized basis, they estimate the impact at roughly $10 million, shifting value away from token holders.
Marc Zeller, founder of the Aave Chan Initiative, criticized the move, calling it a “stealth privatization” of brand assets.
Extremely concerning.The stealth privatization of approximately 10% of Aave DAO's potential revenue, leveraging brand and IPs paid for by the DAO, represents a clear attack on the best interests of the $AAVE Token holders.We will prepare an official response with @AaveChan.
— Marc ”七十 Billy” Zeller (@Marczeller) December 12, 2025
Zeller argued that Aave Labs unilaterally altered the economic arrangement without seeking approval from the DAO, which governs the underlying smart contracts.
“Aave Labs, in the pursuit of their own monetization, redirected Aave user volume towards competition. This is unacceptable. By doing this integration, the Aave protocol lost two revenue streams that cannot be easily replaced,” he wrote.
Zeller warned that the lack of communication raises concerns about how future upgrades will be handled.
He pointed specifically to the upcoming V4 upgrade and questioned whether other “accessory features” could also be ring-fenced from the DAO.
“It is important to consider the picture as a whole to define if Aave Labs breached its expected fiduciary duty towards the Aave DAO and the AAVE token holders, and what we should expect from V4 in general,” Zeller concluded
Aave Labs Defend Moves
In a detailed response, Stani Kulechov, founder and CEO of Aave Labs, defended the integration, rejecting the characterization of the lost funds as stolen revenue.
Kulechov argued that the previous fees from ParaSwap were a “discretionary surplus” rather than a mandated protocol fee.
“It was never a fee switch, its been a surplus that we donated to the DAO,” he stated.
He also drew a sharp line between the Aave protocol, the DAO-governed decentralized smart contracts, and the front-end interface. He described the interface as a private product funded and maintained by Aave Labs.
Kulechov said Aave Labs bears the costs of engineering and security for the website. He added that the DAO does not subsidize ongoing product development expenses.
Consequently, the firm asserts the right to monetize the interface to ensure its sustainability.
“It’s also perfectly fine for Aave Labs to monetize its products, especially as they don’t touch the protocol itself,” he said.
The development firm also restated Kulechov’s position, acknowledging a failure to communicate the change effectively.
The firm said it switched to CoW Swap to deliver better execution prices and stronger protection against MEV (maximum extractable value), rather than to generate additional revenue.
Read the article at BeInCryptoDisclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
COAI Token Fraud: Insights for Cryptocurrency Investors During Times of Regulatory Ambiguity
- COAI token's 88% collapse in late 2025 exposed systemic risks in AI-driven DeFi ecosystems, with $116.8M investor losses. - Governance flaws included 87.9% token concentration in ten wallets, untested AI stablecoins, and lack of open-source audits. - Panic selling accelerated by AI-generated misinformation and CEO resignation, amid conflicting global crypto regulations. - Lessons emphasize scrutinizing token distribution, demanding transparent audits, and avoiding jurisdictions with regulatory ambiguity.

Renewable Energy Training as a Key Investment to Meet Future Workforce Needs
- Farmingdale State College's Wind Turbine Technology program aligns with surging demand for skilled labor in decarbonizing economies, driven by U.S. renewable energy targets. - Industry partnerships with Orsted, GE Renewable Energy, and $500K in offshore wind funding validate the program's role in addressing workforce shortages in expanding wind sectors. - Hands-on training with GWO certifications and VR simulations prepares graduates for high-demand, high-salary roles ($56K-$67K annually), reducing corpo

The Revival of STEM Learning as a Driving Force for Tomorrow’s Technology Investments
- Emerging STEM universities are driving tech innovation through interdisciplinary curricula and industry partnerships, focusing on AI, biotech , and advanced manufacturing. - U.S. programs like STEM Talent Challenge and NSF Future Manufacturing allocate $500K-$25.5M to bridge skills gaps and fund projects in quantum tech and biomanufacturing. - Leadership-focused STEM programs at institutions like Florida State and Purdue boost startup success rates (75-80%) and align with venture capital trends favoring

Assessing KITE’s Price Prospects After Listing as Institutional Interest Rises
- Kite Realty Group (KRG) reported Q3 2025 earnings below forecasts but raised 2025 guidance, citing 5.2% ABR growth and 1.2M sq ft lease additions. - Institutional investors showed mixed activity, with Land & Buildings liquidating a 3.6% stake while others increased holdings, reflecting valuation debates. - Technical indicators suggest bullish momentum (price above 50/200-day averages) but a 23.1% undervaluation vs. 35.1x P/E, exceeding sector averages. - KRG lags peers like Simon Property in dividend yie

