CoinShares Challenges Tether Solvency Criticisms
- CoinShares’ James Butterfill addresses Tether solvency concerns with evidence.
- Arthur Hayes and S&P critique Tether’s reserves.
- Butterfill highlights Tether’s substantial reserve surplus.
CoinShares Head of Research James Butterfill has challenged criticisms about Tether’s (USDT) solvency and stability, offering a detailed response in a CoinShares research note.
His rebuttal, focusing on reserve data, highlights the ongoing debate’s impact on Tether’s market perception and broader concerns about stablecoin stability.
Analysis of Tether’s Solvency
James Butterfill, Head of Research at CoinShares , countered recent critiques of Tether’s solvency. His responses followed challenges from Arthur Hayes and S&P Global , focusing on asset reserves and Bitcoin exposure. Butterfill presented data from Tether’s reserve attestations , citing a surplus of US$6.78 billion. Critiques call attention to potential risks from Tether’s reserve composition. Hayes had highlighted the growing risk in Tether’s profile.
Butterfill’s rebuttal emphasized Tether’s solid financial footing. This comes amid concerns regarding Tether’s increasing reliance on Bitcoin. Institutional investors continue to pour money into major digital assets, showing confidence in crypto infrastructure. The downgrade by S&P was noted, but Butterfill assured the stability of Tether’s reserves. His analysis suggests market confidence remains, evidenced by persistent asset inflows, contrary to fears of systemic risk.
Despite concerns, Bitcoin and Ethereum see substantial inflows, illustrating market resilience. XRP reached record inflows , reflecting varied sentiment in altcoin markets. Butterfill suggests that despite some reserve risks, Tether remains stable. His analysis indicates potential impacts on DeFi and institutional participation. Historical trends on global liquidity are noted, influencing Tether’s position.
“Concerns about Tether solvency also reappeared in market commentary, although these fears look misplaced.” — James Butterfill, Head of Research, CoinShares
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Key Bitcoin price levels to watch ahead of 2025’s last FOMC meeting

Navigating the Fluctuations of Bitcoin in Late 2025: Adaptive Risk Management Approaches for an Evolving Cryptocurrency Landscape
- Bitcoin's November 2025 price swung between $80,553 and $91,000, eroding 25% of value amid macroeconomic and regulatory pressures. - Volatility stemmed from technical breakdowns, leveraged liquidations, and market makers' gamma exposure shifts below $85,000. - U.S. GENIUS Act and EU MiCA framework provided regulatory clarity, boosting institutional adoption through compliant ETPs and stablecoins. - Investors adopted risk-rebalance strategies: options hedging, macro-adjusted DCA, and diversified crypto tr

Bitcoin Experiences Steep Drop: What Causes the Sudden Sell-Off?
- Bitcoin plummeted 30% in November 2025, erasing $1 trillion in market cap amid macroeconomic pressures and institutional profit-taking. - Central bank uncertainty (Fed, ECB) and leveraged liquidations amplified the selloff, with ETF outflows exceeding $3.79 billion. - Bitcoin's 0.90 correlation with the S&P 500 highlighted its shift from "digital gold" to risk-on asset, contrasting gold's 55% surge. - On-chain metrics revealed structural weaknesses: hash rate declines, miner revenue drops, and divergent

PENGU USDT Sell Alert and Stablecoin Price Fluctuations: Evaluating Algorithmic Dangers Amid Changing Cryptocurrency Markets
- PENGU USDT's 2025 volatility reignited debates on algorithmic stablecoin fragility amid regulatory uncertainty and post-UST market skepticism. - Technical analysis showed conflicting signals: overbought MFI vs bearish RSI divergence, with critical support/resistance levels at $0.010-$0.013. - $66.6M team wallet outflows and 32% open interest growth highlighted liquidity risks, while UST's collapse legacy exposed algorithmic design flaws. - Investors increasingly favor fiat-backed alternatives like USDC ,
