Is the ISM Losing Its Power — or Pointing to a 2026 Bitcoin Supercycle?
As macro experts argue over the ISM’s reliability, crypto analysts see deeper implications for Bitcoin’s market cycle. With ISM contraction persisting, many now expect the next Bitcoin peak to come later—potentially stretching well into 2026.
A fierce debate has broken out among macro analysts over the credibility of the ISM Manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI). Experts say this key economic metric is being overused to predict business cycles and Bitcoin market tops.
The clash highlights a growing divide between traditional economic modeling and modern financial conditions-driven analysis, with ripple effects reaching deep into crypto market forecasting.
ISM Debate Splits Macro Analysts as Crypto Traders Reassess the 2026 Bitcoin Peak
CFA Julien Bittel, a macro strategist at Global Macro Investor (GMI), dismisses many of Wall Street’s go-to indicators as outdated or misinterpreted.
“Delinquency rates, ISM, PMIs, job openings, retail sales — none of these are leading indicators…Everything is downstream to changes in financial conditions,” Bittel wrote.
Bittel explained that GMI’s proprietary US Coincident Business Cycle Index integrates forward-moving elements within the data, including early employment signals, and that it began turning higher in mid-2022, months before ISM and other metrics rebounded.
According to Bittel, the labor market’s gradual cooling is actually a positive sign, paving the way for lower rates and renewed economic expansion.
However, macro strategist Henrik Zeberg presents a contrary opinion, calling for caution around treating survey-based indicators as reality.
“ISM is NOT the business cycle or the economy. It is a damn survey! In July 2022, many called for a recession based on the same GMI score. We did not see one. Maybe the score needs calibration?” Zeberg wrote.
Their public disagreement births a wider discussion about how much weight the ISM PMI still deserves. The index measures US manufacturing activity and has remained below the neutral 50 mark for more than seven months, signaling contraction. However, it has not coincided with a full-blown recession.
US ISM Manufacturing PMI. Source:
ISM-Bitcoin Correlation Suggests a Longer Bull Market Could Extend Into 2026
Historically, the ISM’s moves have also correlated with major Bitcoin cycle tops, a connection first popularized by macro investor Raoul Pal.
NEW: Raoul Pal believes Bitcoin is now following a five-year market cycle, due to an extended debt maturity period and its close correlation with the ISM manufacturing index. 🤔Using an ISM-Bitcoin chart and a 5.4-year SIN curve, Pal predicts Bitcoin will likely peak around Q2…
— Bitcoin News (@BitcoinNewsCom) September 27, 2025
That correlation has now captured the attention of the crypto community. Analysts like Colin Talks Crypto and Lark Davis argue that the ISM’s prolonged stagnation could mean Bitcoin’s bull market will stretch far beyond its typical four-year rhythm.
“All three past Bitcoin cycle tops have broadly aligned with this index,” Colin noted.
The analyst suggested that a cycle top could be mid-2026 for the Bitcoin price if the relationship holds. Entrepreneur and Bitcoin investor Davis agreed, noting that while everyone expects a Q4 2025 peak, the ISM has not shown real expansion yet, meaning this cycle could go way deeper into 2026.
Everyone's expecting this cycle to peak in Q4 this year.But I think we're going way deeper into 2026.Here's why:The classic 4-year business cycle usually have 2 years of expansion and 2 years contraction. That should’ve lined up with a Q4 2025 top.But this time, the ISM…
— Lark Davis (@TheCryptoLark) October 1, 2025
A weaker ISM often implies delayed economic recovery and longer market expansions. Despite current headwinds from tariffs to sluggish global demand, the extended contraction phase may lengthen the broader business cycle rather than end it.
While this could translate to a more gradual, durable uptrend for the Bitcoin price, it warns against expecting an early peak as the 2025–2026 cycle debate shapes into a consequential narrative linking traditional economics and digital assets.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Supreme Court Decision on Tariffs May Require $140 Billion in Refunds and Prompt Federal Reserve to Lower Rates
- UBS warns a Supreme Court ruling against Trump's tariffs could force $140B refunds, straining U.S. fiscal resources and prompting potential Fed rate cuts. - The refunds stem from 39% Swiss tariffs deemed potentially unlawful, with fiscal impact equivalent to 7.9% of 2025's projected budget deficit. - Legal challenges highlight executive overreach risks, while reduced tariffs could boost consumer spending and ease inflation, creating room for Fed easing. - Swiss business leaders have lobbied Trump to lowe

Ethereum Updates: TRON's GreatVoyage: Strengthening USDT's $122B Network to Compete with Ethereum

Arm's Low-Power Architectures Overcome AI Energy Constraints, Fuel 34% Growth in Revenue
- Arm Holdings reported $1.14B Q3 revenue, 34% YoY growth surpassing forecasts, driven by AI/data center demand. - Royalty revenue rose 21% to $620M while licensing revenue jumped 56% to $515M, reflecting strong IP adoption. - Strategic shift to develop full-chip solutions via Compute Sub Systems aims to compete with Nvidia/Amazon in AI hardware. - Parent company SoftBank explored Arm-Marvell merger to strengthen AI infrastructure, highlighting industry consolidation trends. - 20 "buy" ratings and $155 pri

Fed Faces a Choice: Boost Growth or Curb Mounting Debt?
- U.S. household debt hit $18.59 trillion in Q3 2025, driven by rising credit card, student loan, and home equity debt with delinquency rates at multi-year highs. - The Fed initiated rate cuts amid slowing job growth but faces a dilemma: easing economic strain risks inflating a consumer debt bubble while tightening worsens defaults. - Retailers, banks, and auto lenders face fallout as discretionary spending declines and loan defaults rise, while essential goods and debt collectors see increased demand. - P

