After a whale liquidated its ETH holdings for a profit of $11.6 million, it shorted BTC and ETH on Hyperliquid, resulting in a $4 million loss.
according to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, a whale cleared ETH at a price of $4,221 two weeks ago, making a profit of $11.6 million, leading to an increase in the market. In the past two days, it opened a short position worth $137 million on Hyperliquid, currently at a loss of $4 million.
After closing the short position in June, the whale bought 6,037 ETH spot at a price of $2,299. On September 22, it cleared the ETH bought in June at a price of $4,221, making a profit of $11.6 million.
After selling ETH, the market continued to rise. In the past two days, the whale has shorted $137 million worth of BTC and ETH on Hyperliquid, currently at a loss of $4 million. Shorting 800 BTC at 40x leverage, worth $100 million, with an opening price of $120,892 and a liquidation price of $129,848; shorting 8,000 ETH at 20x leverage, worth $37 million, with an opening price of $4,502 and a liquidation price of $5,109.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After bitcoin returns to $90,000, is Christmas or a Christmas crash coming next?
This Thanksgiving, we are grateful for bitcoin returning to $90,000.

Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.

