Ethereum co-creator Vitalik Buterin advocates for 'copyleft' software publishing
Quick Take Ethereum co-creator Vitalik Buterin has formalized his stance on software publishing and now advocates for slightly more restrictive “copyleft” licenses, according to a new blog on Monday. According to Buterin, licenses like CC-BY-SA and GPL require developers to release any derivative code under the same licenses, which is slightly more restrictive than pure open-source publishing.
Ethereum co-creator Vitalik Buterin has formalized his stance on software publishing and now advocates for slightly more restrictive “copyleft” licenses, according to a new blog on Monday. This is a change from Buterin’s previous support of permissive licenses, which enable developers to use and redistribute code “for any purpose with no restrictions.”
“If you create and distribute a derivative work by modifying it or combining it with other work, the new work must also be released under the same license,” Buterin said, explaining slightly less permissive “copyleft” licenses like CC-BY-SA and GPL.
While still broadly opposed to copyright, Buterin’s latest position is an attempt at "using copyright against itself" by requiring developers to use a publishing license that ensures derivative works will also remain accessible to the public, he wrote.
According to Buterin, his latest stance has been shaped by the mainstream adoption of open-source code by companies like Google and Huawei, as well as the increasingly competitive cryptocurrency landscape.
“The crypto space in particular has become more competitive and mercenary, and we are less able than before to count on people open-sourcing their work purely out of niceness,” Buterin wrote. “Hence, the argument for open source cannot just rely on ‘please;’ it must also be accompanied by the ‘hard power’ of giving access to some code only to those who open up theirs.”
Crypto, as an offshoot of the cypherpunk ecosystem, has broadly been supportive of open-source software that enables the free use and remixing of existing codebases. However, it has been a tense issue at times, especially within the NFT sector, where some artists have sought greater protection over their work.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After bitcoin returns to $90,000, is Christmas or a Christmas crash coming next?
This Thanksgiving, we are grateful for bitcoin returning to $90,000.

Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.

