Top Democrat Rep. Maxine Waters releases draft proposal to regulate stablecoins: Punchbowl News
Quick Take The discussion draft includes language around federal regulators for stablecoins including the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. On the other side of the aisle, last week Republicans House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill alongside Rep. Bryan Steil released draft legislation to regulate stablecoins.
Top Democrat of the House Financial Services Committee Maxine Waters released a discussion draft on Monday to regulate stablecoins, according to a copy obtained by Punchbowl News.
The discussion draft includes language around federal regulators for stablecoins, including the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and also state regulators. Stablecoin issuers that are registered also would have reporting requirements and would be required to have reserves back "on an at least one-to-one basis," according to the draft legislation.
Waters' office did not respond to a request for comment.
Waters has worked with now former House Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., to create a regulatory framework for stablecoins since 2022. A bill passed out of the Republican-led committee last year. At the time, Waters called the bill "deeply problematic" due to a provision that allows state regulators to approve stablecoin issuances without Federal Reserve input.
Waters' draft is based on discussions with McHenry, Punchbowl News' Brendan Pedersen reported .
Waters, the California Democrat previously chair of the House Financial Services Committee, had called for a "grand bargain on stablecoins" before the end of 2024, signaling optimism that a deal could be reached, but that didn't come to fruition.
On the other side of the aisle, last week, Republican House Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill, alongside Rep. Bryan Steil, released draft legislation to regulate stablecoins.
That Republican-led draft also builds on work done over the past few years, though it has a few differences. For example, it gives the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency the authority to "approve and supervise federally qualified nonbank payment stablecoin issuers " instead of including a federal path through the Federal Reserve for "payment stablecoin issuers."
Work is also underway in the Senate following the introduction of a bill to regulate stablecoins by Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., called the "Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins.
Hagerty's bill was introduced just ahead of a press conference on Feb. 4, where lawmakers announced they would be forming a working group to write rules for crypto and stablecoins. That working group included members from the House Financial Services Committee, Senate Agriculture Committee, House Agriculture Committee and the Senate Banking Committee.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
After bitcoin returns to $90,000, is Christmas or a Christmas crash coming next?
This Thanksgiving, we are grateful for bitcoin returning to $90,000.

Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.

