
Arixaz786
2025/10/08 20:18
💀Dead coins Vs👻 Live Tokens
What does “dead coin” vs “live token” mean
Live tokens are crypto projects that are active, well-maintained, in regular use, have liquidity, development updates, and community engagement.
Dead coins are projects that have lost activity. They might have low or zero trading volume, abandoned development, broken networks or smart contracts, possibly delisted or on the verge of delisting. They provide little to no utility, and many investors treat them as non-functional assets.
Bitget (like other exchanges) doesn’t always explicitly use the terms “dead” or “live,” but their policies around delisting, “special treatment,” and token monitoring serve to distinguish between them in practice.
Bitget’s Role & Policies
Here’s how Bitget deals with tokens/projects and how it handles the boundary between “live” and “dead” (or “at risk”):
Periodic Review and Delisting
Bitget regularly reviews all listed tokens/trading pairs to ensure they meet certain standards.
Factors Bitget considers include:
• Trading volume & liquidity
• Activity of the development team & project updates
• Stability of the network or smart contract
• Community activity, project responsiveness
• Any fraudulent or unethical behavior.
“ST” (Special Treatment) Label / Warnings
Bitget has an “ST rules” policy, which marks tokens that show signs of being risky or underperforming.
Some of the criteria for ST marking are:
• Poor liquidity or shallow order depth for long periods
• Low trading volume
• Decline in project development or maintenance
• Team no longer active; project abandoned
• Violations or deceptive behavior by the project team.
Once a token is marked ST, Bitget watches it closely, and if conditions do not improve, it may be delisted.
Delisting Process
When Bitget decides to delist a token (or a spot/futures pair), they issue advance notice.
Deposits are usually suspended before the final delisting date. Withdrawals often remain open for a period after delisting to let users move their assets off the platform.
Pending orders are canceled.
They also apply these rules to futures products: for example, a futures pair might be labeled, restricted, or removed if conditions like volatility, risk, or project inactivity get too high.
Transparency & Communication
Bitget announces delistings in its Support Center and via official channels ahead of time.
The platform also publishes its criteria and rules (e.g. the ST policy) so users know what kind of behavior or performance expectations tokens must meet.
Examples
Here are a few real examples that illustrate how Bitget treats tokens/projects that verge toward “dead coin” status, or how they delist underperforming pairs:
BIP1/USDT was delisted from Bitget’s spot market on 24 April 2025. Reasons included low adherence to Bitget’s periodic review standards (volume, liquidity etc.).
Seven trading pairs (CLORE/USDT, MXC/USDT, WOOF/USDT, ZZZ/USDT, MOTHER/USDT, SILLY/USDT, FRED/USDT) were scheduled for delisting on 15 May 2025. Again, low activity and other criteria were cited.
PIKA/USDT was also delisted due to “insufficient trading volume and liquidity requirements.”
These examples show tokens that were “live” at one point, but moved toward being “dead” (or at least non-viable under Bitget’s listing metrics), and were removed.
Takeaways: What Users Should Know / Watch Out For
Just because a token is listed now doesn’t mean it will always stay listed. Low volume, inactivity, or project stagnation can lead to delisting.
Always monitor things like development activity (GitHub commits, announcements), community engagement, liquidity, trading volume. If these drop, that token might be “at risk.”
If a coin gets ST-marked or flagged, that's a warning sign. It may be still “live,” but potentially becoming “dead” if no improvements.
When a delisting notice is given, act quickly: move your tokens off exchange if you want to keep them. Withdrawals may remain open only for a limited time.
Diversify risk: don’t put too much stake in very new or obscure tokens, because many of those are more likely to “die” (delist or lose utility).
$BTC $BGB

Cryptonews Official
2025/05/18 19:45
Milei siblings ghost court in $4.5m LIBRA scam hearing
Argentine President Javier Milei and his sister Karina failed to attend a scheduled session related to the LIBRA meme coin scandal.
Interestingly, no legal representatives appeared on their behalf. The virtual hearing was a preliminary step before potential civil litigation surrounding the multi-million dollar crypto scheme.
According to a report by the Argentinian newspaper Página/12 , the digital conference, arranged with an official mediator, saw attendance from just one attorney who represented defendant Manuel Terrones Godoy. Godoy reportedly had prior involvement with similar financial irregularities.
Federal Judge María Servini has intensified the probe by formally requesting the Central Bank to provide access to the President’s financial records. The judicial order, which extends to Karina Milei, the Secretary General of the Presidency, seeks banking information dating back to 2023.
The investigation follows allegations that the Mileis had connections to promoters of the Libra ( LIBRA ) cryptocurrency. LIBRA collapsed shortly after the president endorsed it on social media. Court documents show the fraud may have affected approximately 25 victims across Argentina and internationally, with losses estimated at $4.5 million.
Servini has already moved to freeze assets belonging to several businesspeople involved in the creation and promotion of the digital currency.
Among those targeted are Mauricio Novelli, founder of Tech Forum Argentina who reportedly connected the Mileis with American developer Hayden Davis; Sergio Morales, a former National Securities Commission advisor; and social media personality Manuel Terrones Godoy.
The legal action against Novelli extends to family members, including his mother, María Alicia Rafaele, and sister, María Pía Novelli.
Security footage from a Galicia bank branch shows the women entering with empty bags on February 17 and departing with visibly full containers. This was just one business day after President Milei’s cryptocurrency endorsement.
“At 11:03:08, the women were observed exiting the branch with their handbag and backpack appearing significantly more filled than when they arrived,” states a Federal Police report from the Money Laundering division.
The controversy started on Feb. 14 when President Milei promoted the LIBRA launch on his social platforms. While the cryptocurrency briefly appreciated in value, it quickly plunged. Milei subsequently published a statement claiming he had no knowledge of the transaction details.