Bernstein Report: Bitcoin’s current correction provides opportunity to buy on dips ahead of halving
ChainCatcher news, according to The Block, Wall Street investment bank Bernstein analysts Gautam Chhugani and Mahika Sapra wrote in a report to clients on Tuesday: “We believe that Bitcoin’s current consolidation phase is temporary. and provides a dip-buying opportunity ahead of the Bitcoin halving. We continue to believe that there is a cross-cycle 18-month opportunity for Bitcoin and the entire crypto ecosystem. Expect the market to correct before the halving and then The overall bull market is expected to continue."
“ETF flows are reflexive – higher on the upside and slower on weaker price action,” the analyst noted. However, as Bitcoin’s price action has historically consolidated ahead of halvings , and given the rise it experienced prior to the Bitcoin Spot ETF approval and following massive net inflows since its launch on January 11, the recent price action is not surprising. “This pullback appears to be healthy and does not impact our cross-cyclical view that Bitcoin will reach a cycle high of $150,000 in 2025,” the analysts wrote.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Bitcoin security reaches a historic high, but miner revenue drops to a historic low. Where will mining companies find new sources of income?
The current paradox of the Bitcoin network is particularly striking: while the protocol layer has never been more secure due to high hash power, the underlying mining industry is facing pressure from capital liquidation and consolidation.

What are the privacy messaging apps Session and SimpleX donated by Vitalik?
Why did Vitalik take action? From content encryption to metadata privacy.

The covert war escalates: Hyperliquid faces a "kamikaze" attack, but the real battle may have just begun
The attacker incurred a loss of 3 million in a "suicidal" attack, but may have achieved breakeven through external hedging. This appears more like a low-cost "stress test" targeting the protocol's defensive capabilities.

