Spot

Futures

Trading bots

Copy trading

Trading info

Bitget
/
Pre-market
/
MOVE

MOVE

Ended

Deposit pending

About

Last price (USDT)

2.87M

24h total (USDT)

4.37M

Total vol (USDT)

2024-12-05 07:00:00 ~ 2024-12-09 11:30:00

Trading time (UTC+0)

2024-12-09 13:00:00 ~ 2024-12-09 17:00:00

Delivery time (UTC+0)

Total supply10.00B

Community

Discord

Resources

Whitepaper

Website

Introduction

Movement Network is an ecosystem of Modular Move-Based Blockchains that enables developers to build secure, performant, and interoperable blockchain applications, bridging the gap between Move and EVM ecosystems.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs Defy Odds with $150M Net Inflow Despite BlackRock’s $136M Outflow

In a surprising turn of events, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have demonstrated remarkable resilience. On December 9th, these funds collectively attracted a net inflow of $150 million. This positive movement occurred even as one of the largest players, BlackRock, experienced a significant withdrawal. The data reveals a fascinating shift in investor sentiment and capital allocation within the cryptocurrency market. What Do the Spot Bitcoin ETF Inflow Numbers Really Show? According to data from TraderT, the headline figure is a robust $150 million net inflow into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. However, the real story lies beneath the surface. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) recorded a substantial net outflow of $136 million on the same day. This means other spot Bitcoin ETFs had to perform exceptionally well to not only offset this loss but also generate a strong overall gain. The activity highlights a diverse and dynamic market where flows are not dependent on a single fund. Which Spot Bitcoin ETFs Are Winning Investor Confidence? The inflows were not evenly distributed. Several funds emerged as clear winners, attracting the capital that flowed out of BlackRock’s offering. Here is a breakdown of the major inflows: Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC): Led the pack with a massive $190 million inflow. Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust: Attracted $33.79 million. Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC): Saw $17.48 million in new capital. Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB): Gained $16.22 million. ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB): Received $5.26 million. This distribution shows that investor interest in spot Bitcoin ETFs is broadening beyond the initial launch giants. Why Is This Movement Significant for Spot Bitcoin ETFs? This data point is crucial for several reasons. First, it proves the market for spot Bitcoin ETFs has depth and liquidity. A major outflow from one fund does not cripple the entire sector. Second, it indicates that investors are becoming more sophisticated. They are actively choosing between different spot Bitcoin ETF products based on factors like fees, the issuer’s reputation, or specific fund structures. Finally, a net positive day amidst volatility reinforces the thesis that these ETFs are becoming a permanent, legitimate gateway for institutional and retail capital into Bitcoin. What Challenges Do Spot Bitcoin ETFs Face? Despite the positive flow, challenges remain. The market is highly sensitive to Bitcoin’s price movements. A sustained bear market could test the resilience of these inflows. Furthermore, competition is fierce, with issuers potentially engaging in fee wars to attract assets. Regulatory scrutiny also remains a constant backdrop for all spot Bitcoin ETFs. Navigating these hurdles will be key to their long-term success. Actionable Insights for Crypto Investors For investors watching this space, the flow data offers valuable signals. The diversification of inflows suggests it may be wise to research beyond the most prominent spot Bitcoin ETF. Monitoring these weekly flow reports can provide insight into institutional sentiment. Moreover, understanding that outflows from one fund can be offset by others underscores the overall health of the product category. It’s a reminder that the spot Bitcoin ETF landscape is maturing rapidly. In conclusion, the $150 million net inflow for U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs is a powerful testament to the product’s growing acceptance. The ability to absorb a large outflow from a major issuer like BlackRock and still post a significant gain marks a milestone. It shows the market is not a monolith but a competitive arena where capital seeks the best opportunity. This resilience bodes well for the future of regulated Bitcoin investment vehicles. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is a spot Bitcoin ETF? A spot Bitcoin ETF is an exchange-traded fund that holds actual Bitcoin. It allows investors to gain exposure to Bitcoin’s price without having to buy, store, or secure the cryptocurrency directly. Why did BlackRock’s IBIT have an outflow? Specific reasons for daily flows are rarely disclosed. It could be due to profit-taking by a large investor, portfolio rebalancing by an institution, or a shift to another spot Bitcoin ETF with lower fees or different features. Are net inflows always good for Bitcoin’s price? Generally, yes. Net inflows mean new money is entering the market to buy Bitcoin, which creates buying pressure. However, many other macro and crypto-specific factors also influence Bitcoin’s price. How can I track these spot Bitcoin ETF flows? Data is regularly published by analytics firms and other financial news platforms covering cryptocurrency also summarize this data daily or weekly. What’s the difference between GBTC and the Grayscale Mini Trust? The Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) is the original, larger fund. The Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust is a newer, lower-fee spin-off product designed to be more competitive with other spot Bitcoin ETFs. Is investing in a spot Bitcoin ETF safe? While they are regulated financial products, spot Bitcoin ETFs carry the same volatility risk as Bitcoin itself. They are not risk-free but eliminate the technical risks of self-custody. Found this analysis of spot Bitcoin ETF flows insightful? Help other investors stay informed by sharing this article on your social media channels. The more we understand these market movements, the smarter the investment community becomes. To learn more about the latest Bitcoin trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin institutional adoption.

Blockchain Capital UNI Withdrawal: A $6.48M Signal for the Crypto Market

A significant move just rocked the Uniswap ecosystem. On-chain data reveals a wallet linked to venture capital giant Blockchain Capital executed a major Blockchain Capital UNI withdrawal, pulling a staggering 1.13 million UNI tokens—worth $6.48 million—from three centralized exchanges. This action, tracked by Lookonchain, immediately sparks a crucial question for every crypto investor: Is this a strategic accumulation or a precursor to a sell-off? What Does This Major Blockchain Capital UNI Withdrawal Mean? The transaction is notable for its scale and timing. The address completed the Blockchain Capital UNI withdrawal over a concise six-hour window, suggesting a deliberate and coordinated effort. Following this move, the wallet’s total UNI holdings now stand at 1.92 million tokens, valued at approximately $10.88 million. This concentration of assets from a single, influential entity naturally draws market scrutiny. Large withdrawals from exchanges, often called ‘exchange outflows,’ can signal that a holder intends to stake, vote in governance, or simply hold long-term—actions typically viewed as bullish. Conversely, deposits to exchanges often precede selling. Therefore, this Blockchain Capital UNI withdrawal could be interpreted as a vote of confidence in UNI’s future, potentially reducing immediate sell-side pressure on the market. Why Should Crypto Traders Care About VC Moves? Venture capital firms like Blockchain Capital are not typical retail traders. Their actions are usually research-driven and strategic. Monitoring their on-chain behavior provides invaluable, real-time insight into what sophisticated market participants are doing. Market Sentiment Indicator: Large accumulations can signal strong fundamental belief in a project’s long-term value. Liquidity Impact: Moving millions of dollars in tokens affects market liquidity and can influence price discovery. Governance Influence: With 1.92 million UNI, this address holds substantial voting power in Uniswap’s decentralized governance, shaping the protocol’s future. Therefore, this Blockchain Capital UNI withdrawal is more than just a transaction; it’s a data point reflecting institutional strategy within the DeFi space. Could This UNI Movement Impact the Token’s Price? Direct cause-and-effect in crypto markets is complex, but major movements create ripples. The immediate effect of this withdrawal is a reduction of readily sellable UNI on exchanges. This can sometimes lead to a tightening of supply, which, if coupled with sustained demand, may support price stability or upward movement. However, it’s crucial to maintain perspective. The total UNI supply is 1 billion tokens. While a $10.88 million position is significant, it represents a fraction of the overall market. The long-term price will depend on broader adoption of Uniswap, overall DeFi activity, and wider crypto market trends. This Blockchain Capital UNI withdrawal is a strong bullish signal, but not a sole price driver. Key Takeaways from the Blockchain Capital Transaction Let’s distill the actionable insights from this event: Watch the Hold: The bullish case strengthens if the tokens remain in the wallet for governance or staking. Context is King: Always analyze such moves against overall market conditions and UNI’s own development roadmap. Tools are Your Friend: Use blockchain explorers and analytics platforms to follow smart money movements. In conclusion, the recent Blockchain Capital UNI withdrawal is a noteworthy event that highlights the growing sophistication of institutional actors in crypto. It demonstrates a potential long-term commitment to one of DeFi’s flagship projects. For savvy investors, it underscores the importance of on-chain analytics as a tool for understanding market dynamics beyond mere price charts. While not a guarantee of future performance, this move adds a compelling layer of confidence to the UNI investment thesis. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: How do we know the address is linked to Blockchain Capital? A1: Blockchain analytics firms like Lookonchain use clustering techniques and trace historical transactions, often linking deposit addresses from known entity wallets to public exchange accounts. While not 100% definitive, the pattern and scale strongly suggest institutional involvement. Q2: Is withdrawing tokens from an exchange always bullish? A2> Generally, yes. Withdrawing tokens from an exchange (an outflow) typically indicates an intent to hold, stake, or use them in DeFi, reducing immediate selling pressure. It is often interpreted more positively than depositing tokens to an exchange (an inflow). Q3: What can you do with UNI tokens besides trade them? A3> UNI holders can participate in Uniswap’s decentralized governance by voting on proposals, delegate their voting power, and in some cases, stake tokens in various liquidity or staking pools to earn rewards. Q4: Does Blockchain Capital’s move mean I should buy UNI? A4> Not necessarily. You should never make investment decisions based on a single data point. Consider this move as one factor among many, including your own research, risk tolerance, and investment strategy. Q5: Where can I track similar large transactions? A5> Platforms offer tools and dashboards to track whale wallets and significant on-chain movements across various blockchains. Q6: What is the total supply of UNI tokens? A6> The total maximum supply of UNI is 1 billion tokens. The circulating supply is slightly less, as the tokens are released over a four-year period ending in 2024. Share This Insight Did this analysis help you understand the implications of major crypto movements? Unlock the knowledge for others! Share this article on your social media channels to help fellow investors decode the signals from institutional players like Blockchain Capital and navigate the market with greater confidence. To learn more about the latest DeFi and governance token trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Uniswap and other leading protocols’ future roadmaps and price action.

Urgent Update: The CLARITY Act Faces Critical Hurdle for Crypto Market Structure

In a striking revelation that could shape the future of digital assets, Senator Cory Booker has declared that the pivotal CLARITY Act faces a significant political hurdle. This crucial legislation for crypto market structure may stall without a specific condition: the appointment of Democratic commissioners to key financial agencies. Let’s explore what this means for the industry and your investments. What is the CLARITY Act and Why Does It Matter? The CLARITY Act represents a landmark effort to create clear rules for the cryptocurrency industry. Its primary goal is to establish a definitive regulatory framework by clarifying the roles of two major agencies: the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Currently, confusion about which agency oversees different crypto assets creates uncertainty for businesses and investors alike. One of the bill’s most significant provisions would exempt certain cryptocurrencies from traditional securities registration requirements. Specifically, digital assets that meet defined conditions wouldn’t need to register under the Securities Act of 1933. This distinction is vital because it recognizes that some cryptocurrencies function more like commodities or currencies than traditional stocks or bonds. Why Are Democratic Commissioners Crucial for the CLARITY Act? During his appearance at the Blockchain Association’s policy conference, Senator Booker presented a compelling argument. He stated that appointing Democratic commissioners to both the SEC and CFTC is necessary to protect these agencies’ independence. This concern stems from potential influence by the current administration under President Trump. Booker’s position highlights several important considerations: Agency Independence: Regulatory bodies must operate without political pressure to ensure fair market oversight Bipartisan Support: Major legislation typically requires support from both political parties to pass successfully Long-term Stability: Regulations created with diverse perspectives tend to be more durable and effective What Challenges Does the CLARITY Act Currently Face? Despite the clear need for regulatory clarity, the path forward for this legislation contains several obstacles. The political landscape presents the most immediate challenge, as commissioner appointments have become increasingly contentious. Furthermore, different stakeholders within the cryptocurrency industry have varying opinions on what constitutes appropriate regulation. However, there’s reason for optimism. During a later panel discussion, Senator Booker expressed confidence that the CLARITY Act will eventually pass. This suggests that while there may be delays, the fundamental need for clear rules will ultimately drive legislative action. The growing mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies adds pressure on lawmakers to establish a workable framework. How Will the CLARITY Act Impact Crypto Investors? For anyone involved in cryptocurrency, the outcome of this legislative effort carries substantial implications. Clear regulations would provide much-needed certainty about which assets fall under which regulatory umbrella. This clarity could encourage greater institutional investment, as large financial entities typically avoid markets with ambiguous rules. Consider these potential benefits of the CLARITY Act: Reduced Legal Uncertainty: Companies would know exactly what regulations apply to their operations Enhanced Consumer Protection: Clear rules help prevent fraud and market manipulation Innovation Support: Entrepreneurs could develop new products with confidence about regulatory treatment Market Stability: Established frameworks tend to reduce volatility caused by regulatory surprises The Road Ahead for Crypto Regulation Senator Booker’s comments reveal an important truth about cryptocurrency legislation: political considerations often influence technical policy decisions. The CLARITY Act addresses genuine market needs, but its progress depends on broader governmental dynamics. This situation isn’t unique to cryptocurrency; many technological innovations face similar regulatory growing pains. As the debate continues, several developments could accelerate progress. Increased public awareness of cryptocurrency benefits might generate constituent pressure on lawmakers. Additionally, if other countries establish clear regulatory frameworks, the United States may feel compelled to keep pace to maintain its financial leadership position. Conclusion: A Necessary Step Forward The CLARITY Act represents a crucial effort to bring order to the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape. While Senator Booker has identified a specific political hurdle—the appointment of Democratic commissioners—the fundamental need for regulatory clarity remains urgent. This legislation would benefit all market participants by establishing clear rules and reducing uncertainty. As the political process unfolds, the cryptocurrency community should engage constructively with policymakers to help shape effective regulations that protect consumers while fostering innovation. Frequently Asked Questions What exactly does the CLARITY Act do? The CLARITY Act creates a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies by clearly dividing oversight responsibilities between the SEC and CFTC. It also provides exemptions from securities registration for digital assets that meet specific conditions. Why does Senator Booker think Democratic commissioners are needed? Booker believes Democratic appointments to the SEC and CFTC are necessary to maintain these agencies’ independence from political influence, particularly from the current administration, which he sees as crucial for the CLARITY Act’s passage. Will the CLARITY Act definitely pass? While Senator Booker expressed confidence it will eventually pass, he acknowledged current political challenges. The legislation has significant support but faces hurdles related to commissioner appointments and broader political dynamics. How will this affect my cryptocurrency investments? Clear regulations generally benefit investors by reducing uncertainty and potentially attracting more institutional money to the space. However, specific impacts will depend on the final legislation’s details and how different cryptocurrencies are classified. What happens if the CLARITY Act doesn’t pass? Without clear federal legislation, cryptocurrency regulation would likely continue as a patchwork of state rules and agency guidance, creating ongoing uncertainty for businesses and investors in the space. When might we see movement on this legislation? Timing depends on political developments, particularly commissioner appointments to the SEC and CFTC. Movement could accelerate if there’s increased public pressure or if other countries advance their own crypto regulations. Found this analysis helpful? Share this article with others who need to understand how the CLARITY Act could shape cryptocurrency’s future. Clear information helps everyone make better decisions in this evolving market. To learn more about the latest cryptocurrency regulatory trends, explore our article on key developments shaping crypto institutional adoption.

Jacob King Challenges MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin Strategy

MicroStrategy bought ten thousand six hundred and twenty-four Bitcoin recently, which Jacob King disputed. He claimed that the market was not receptive since MicroStrategy never shifts the market. He said that Michael Saylor is a more perceptive person rather than accumulative. According to him, this trend has been manifested over the years. He has used the previous corporate behavior to argue his case. He proposed that this new shift was more of narrative engineering than actual effect. The post by him caused heated discussions in crypto circles. The problem of the purpose of the purchase appeared in the minds of many viewers. The rest of the arguments were that MicroStrategy is still among the strongest long-term Bitcoin supporters. The gap increased when the market actors saw price movement. Bitcoin continued to be under severe pressure around that time. With the high-profile acquisition, the market kept dropping. This created further distrust in the significance of the purchase. Critics Reuexamine Saylor Dot-com Misconduct Case King cited the history of Saylor during the dot-com days. He pointed out the settlement by Saylor to the SEC in the year 2000 on the basis of revenue misrepresentation. He reported that Saylor paid eight point three million dollars to shut the claims. Plus, he contended that the mindset of the existing perception resembles the way things have been before. He asserted that the trend was apparent in historical perspective. This was one of the arguments that critics used to challenge the contemporary MicroStrategy practices. The fans justified the work of Saylor by his change of interest to Bitcoin. They claimed that historical occurrences should not undermine the current successes. Analysts inserted additional background of the past. According to them, Saylor restored his company following the downfall. They also pointed out that MicroStrategy became a prominent Bitcoin corporate shareholder. Such a juxtaposition made the situation described by King more controversial. His remarks sparked back past debates on the credibility of Saylor. Bitcoin Price Movement Reason was given by analysts as to why the market was not affected by the purchase. They pointed out that MicroStrategy purchased Bitcoin in OTC. They said that OTC practices do not have exchange slippage and further occurred that the bearish market condition prevailed in sentiment. Bitcoin had fallen over forty percent since November twenty five. The liquidity became strained globally during the quarter. Restrictive policies were maintained by central banks. Investors decreased the level of exposure to speculative assets. This macro pressure revoked any possible bullish impact. Reflexivity theory was also mentioned by the analysts. They described how perception might affect market cycles. They have observed that MicroStrategy tends to overstate the news by making huge announcements. Their argument was that the market responds only when the cycles are bullish. This time the environment did not make any upward momentum. The absence of movement strengthened the same point made by King to some observers. Some other people interpreted the acquisition as a strategic action in the long run. MicroStrategy Balance Sheet Risks The financial position of MicroStrategy was mentioned as well. Analysts noted that the value of Bitcoin holdings of the company now moves to more than sixty billion dollars. They observed that the market of the company is about fifty four billion dollars. They pointed out the imbalance as a risk factor. Recently, the CEO Phong Le mentioned that MicroStrategy had the potential to sell Bitcoin. King applied that fact in order to contend that the strategy is pressured. The commentators raised the question of whether MicroStrategy can hold on to its long-term position.. The market observers got ready to debate more aggressively on the corporate Bitcoin strategies. Those discussions were escalated at an opportune stage by King.

Exodus discloses reduction of BTC and SOL holdings in November, with positions dropping to 1,902 BTC and 31,050 SOL respectively

Jinse Finance reported that Exodus Movement, a self-custody cryptocurrency platform listed on NYSE American under the New York Stock Exchange, has released an update on its cryptocurrency holdings as of November 30, 2025. The disclosure shows the company holds 1,902 BTC (a decrease of 245 compared to the end of October), 2,802 ETH (an increase of 18 compared to the end of October), and 31,050 SOL (a decrease of 18,517 compared to the end of October). Exodus stated that the reduction in its crypto treasury holdings was mainly to meet funding needs for the acquisition of W3C.

Andrew Tate’s Bitcoin Post Sparks MicroStrategy Debate

Bitcoin Community Divided as MicroStrategy’s Latest 10,000 BTC Buy Fails to Move Price — OTC Liquidity and Market Structure Under Scrutiny Andrew Tate’s post questioning why MicroStrategy’s ~10,000 BTC purchase did not move Bitcoin’s price has triggered widespread debate across the crypto community. The exchange highlights a persistent point of confusion among retail traders: how can a buy of this scale take place without producing a visible market reaction? Community Debate Exposes Misunderstanding of Bitcoin OTC Market Depth Andrew Tate’s discussion comes days after MicroStrategy added more than 10,600 BTC — a purchase worth nearly one billion dollars — taking its total holdings above 660,000 coins. Despite the size of the acquisition, Bitcoin barely moved at the time, remaining locked between 88,000 and 92,000 dollars before breaking out only today. I’m huge on BTC but micro strat buy 10k btc ina single day and the price doesn’t move. Explain that to me. — Andrew Tate (@Cobratate) December 8, 2025 Multiple industry participants responded by pointing out that large institutional purchases rarely execute through spot order books. Instead, they are routed via Over-The-Counter (OTC) desks, which match buyers and sellers off-exchange. Because these trades do not pass through public liquidity pools, they avoid slippage and leave no immediate footprint on candles, charts, or price indices. This means a billion-dollar purchase can settle quietly across miners, early wallets, market makers, and distressed sellers without triggering upward movement. Only when OTC inventory cannot meet demand do buyers spill into spot exchanges — and that is when prices react. MicroStrategy’s ability to absorb coins privately reflects Bitcoin’s liquidity depth at current supply levels. Bitcoin Price Movement Depends Less on Size, More on Execution Route Several analysts highlight that MicroStrategy’s buys may look huge but represent a small fraction of active supply. Buying 10,000 BTC is still only ~0.05% of circulating supply, and when sourced through negotiated block trades rather than public spot books, the effect becomes nearly invisible. This illustrates how corporate accumulation can continue even during sideways markets, without retail noticing until after settlement. Binance Founder CZ Commenting on Andrew Tate’s Post Critics, however, argue that MicroStrategy’s strategy relies on perception more than impact. Some suggest the company’s promotional announcements are designed to create bullish sentiment rather than directly shift price. The lack of immediate reaction fuels speculation that headline buys are less influential than investors assume. This discussion lands at a moment of heightened sensitivity. The market only broke out today after a week of stagnation — a move driven not by MicroStrategy but by a mix of whale accumulation, short liquidations, and regulatory developments. The contrast reinforces a key takeaway: visible price movement often reflects late-stage order flow, not the originating buy itself.

Base Launches Cross-Chain Bridge with Solana

Key Points: Base and Solana bridge launched for cross-chain asset movement. Liquidity increase expected on both ecosystems. Market responds with varied reactions to interoperability efforts. Asset Movement and Interoperability Across Chains Base launched a cross-chain bridge with Solana on December 5, 2025, powered by Chainlink’s CCIP, allowing asset interoperability between the two blockchain ecosystems. The bridge facilitates greater liquidity and user engagement across platforms, with potential impacts on Solana’s TVL and Base’s expanding DeFi capabilities. Base launched a cross-chain bridge with Solana utilizing Chainlink CCIP, fostering interoperability and liquidity. The initiative empowers asset exchange between the two networks, enhancing economic interactions for developers and users. The bridge utilizes a robust security framework. The bridge is supported by key figures like Jesse Pollak from Base, emphasizing shared liquidity. Chainlink’s Sergey Nazarov called it a milestone for secure cross-chain interoperability. Anatoly Yakovenko of Solana raised concerns about asset execution balance. Initial market reactions show enthusiasm among Base users who anticipate new yield opportunities. Concerns are raised within the Solana community regarding potential asset outflows. Developers from both networks engage in integration discussions following the bridge’s launch. Financially, there’s an uptick in activity within Base DeFi ecosystems. Analysts foresee shifts in Total Value Locked (TVL) between networks. Some observers warn of “vampire attack” dynamics if Solana assets predominantly migrate to Base without reciprocal flows. Expert reactions highlight the potential of infrastructure expansion across DeFi ecosystems. Developers monitor GitHub for integration guidance. Market analysts track asset flows to assess long-term impacts and competitive positioning in the DeFi space. The bridge launch reflects historical trends of cross-chain collaborations impacting ecosystem balances. Past instances showed temporary TVL shifts with eventual equilibrium restoration. This bridge could redefine liquidity dynamics if implemented without adverse extraction effects.

Worldcoin Faces Market Jitters After $25.6 Million WLD Movement: Can $0.55 Hold?

Worldcoin faces selling pressure after a $25.6 million WLD team token transfer. Price action tests key support at $0.55, with potential drop toward $0.50. Recovery above $0.6 could stabilize WLD and target the 20-day EMA at $0.635. Worldcoin has seen turbulence as the team moved a significant chunk of WLD tokens. Traders reacted quickly, and market sentiment turned cautious. Currently, WLD trades at $0.58, slightly higher on the day, yet the altcoin struggles to break past strong downward pressure. The recent $25.6 million token transfer has raised alarms about potential selling on exchanges. Investors now watch key support levels closely to gauge the next move. LARGE $WLD TEAM REALLOCATION 2 hours ago, the main team wallet transferred $25.6M worth of $WLD to two additional team-linked addresses Historically, tokens from these wallets have often been routed to exchanges through Amber Group wallets, suggesting potential future outflows… pic.twitter.com/RFyVgVY3E2 — onchainschool.pro (@how2onchain) December 6, 2025 $25.6 Million WLD Transfer Sparks Concern The Worldcoin main team moved 44 million WLD tokens to two separate wallets. One received 24 million, while the other got 20 million tokens. Past patterns suggest such transfers often end up on exchanges via Amber Group wallets. A similar move last month involved 40 million tokens, which were listed and drove the price down to $0.56. This recent transfer hints at possible future outflows that may intensify selling pressure. The market already faces heavy bearish momentum, and more listings could worsen the decline. Traders remain cautious as team wallets continue to influence WLD supply dynamics . Even with a small daily gain of 1.0%, the weekly chart shows a 7.2% drop. This highlights the altcoin’s struggle to regain traction amid ongoing bearish forces. Market participants now consider whether the $0.55 support can hold against potential further outflows. Selling Pressure Remains Intense Investor sentiment has turned cautious, and sellers dominate the market. Spot Taker CVD data shows a shift back to red after two days in positive territory. This indicates buyers are failing to regain control. Over the past 24 hours, WLD experienced 10.65 million in sell volume versus 9.8 million in buy volume. The negative Buy Sell Delta of -0.85 million further confirms heightened selling activity. Historically, such intense selling often precedes lower prices. The Stochastic Momentum Index currently sits at -37, reflecting strong downward momentum. This signals that WLD may struggle to maintain its current levels unless buyers step in decisively. If the recently moved tokens hit exchanges, WLD could breach the $0.55 support and drop toward $0.50. Traders must monitor order books and exchange inflows to anticipate potential price dips. Recovery above $0.6 could stabilize the market and target the 20-day EMA at $0.635. Such a move would relieve pressure and give confidence to investors looking for a rebound. Market watchers now consider both technical indicators and token flow from team wallets as crucial factors. The combination of bearish momentum, large transfers, and low buying interest keeps the market cautious. Investors must remain alert to any sudden outflows that could amplify downward pressure. Worldcoin continues to trade under significant scrutiny as the market reacts to these developments.

XRP Stuck Between $2.00 and $2.20 as Network Activity Hits 3-Month Low

XRP is once again trapped in tight consolidation, extending a rangebound pattern that has held the altcoin for several days. The altcoin is drawing renewed attention from traders, but this interest has not yet translated into meaningful market participation or price expansion. XRP Investors Pull Back The number of active addresses on the XRP Ledger has dropped sharply, falling to 35,931 — the lowest level in more than three months. This decline highlights waning investor engagement as users pull back from transacting on the network. The lack of consistent activity reinforces the perception that XRP is struggling to generate momentum. This retraced participation weakens the foundation needed for a sustainable recovery. When network activity falls this low, price rallies often lose strength quickly. This is making it difficult for XRP to build the demand required to break out of its established range. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter XRP Active Addresses. Source: The NVT ratio is flashing another warning sign as it surges to a two-week high. A rising NVT typically suggests that an asset is overvalued relative to its transaction volume. In XRP’s case, subdued on-chain activity and elevated valuation pressure form a bearish combination that complicates recovery prospects. This imbalance indicates that investors may be pricing in optimism that the network’s current fundamentals do not support. Until transaction activity increases, XRP will likely remain vulnerable to correction despite brief speculative rallies. XRP NVT Ratio. Source: XRP Price Faces Sideways Movement XRP is trading at $2.08 at the time of writing, maintaining a position above the $2.02 support. The altcoin has been stuck between $2.20 and $2.02 for several days. This reflects a lack of directional conviction. The $2.00 zone remains a critical psychological and structural support. XRP may appear to bounce off $2.02 at times, but given current sentiment and macro signals, it will likely remain capped below $2.20 unless buyer interest strengthens. XRP Price Analysis. Source: If market conditions deteriorate further and XRP loses both $2.02 and $2.00, the bullish-neutral thesis would collapse. A breakdown could send the price below $1.94 and toward $1.85, exposing XRP to deeper losses.

Upbit Hack Update: Team Freezes $1.77M of Victims’ Fund in Latest Recovery

Key Notes The Upbit team has been monitoring any suspicious wallet activity across all wallets by using its own Automatic Tracking Service (OTS). The exchange is collaborating with global platforms, blacklisting addresses, and strengthening security at the platform. Upbit has also launched a global recovery program offering 10% of the funds recovered to all contributors. Crypto exchange Upbit has shared the team’s latest efforts in freezing $1.77 million of victims’ funds, as part of the recovery, following a major hack at the end of November. The team froze these funds after detecting an abnormal withdrawal incident involving a Solana-linked wallet. Upbit Team Vigilant on Hacker’s Movement on Stolen Funds The Upbit team is staying vigilant over the hacker’s movement of stolen funds, following the $38 million crypto exchange hack in November. It previously detected suspicious outflows, immediately halted deposits and withdrawals, and upgraded its wallet infrastructure. As part of its security tightening measures, Upbit is using its proprietary on-chain Automatic Tracking Service (OTS) to trace the movement of the stolen funds. Upbit’s asset tracking team conducted round-the-clock monitoring to identify the on-chain movement and related addresses, as shared by a local news publication. Besides, the team has already blacklisted suspicious addresses and is also collaborating with global exchanges to detect and prevent further transfers. Exchanges worldwide were alerted and asked to freeze any deposits originating from the flagged wallets. Related article: Crypto Hacks Rise for 3rd Consecutive Month Upbit admitted that there was an internal security vulnerability during the hack. In a customer-first priority, the exchange has already covered the $26 million in stolen funds using its own corporate assets. Implementing a Reward Program to Recover Assets Within hours of the hack, Upbit froze $1.56 million of assets. However, with continuous team efforts and cooperation, the number has reached a total of $1.77 million. To strengthen recovery efforts, the exchange has launched a global recovery contribution reward program. It has invited security experts, crypto exchanges, white-hat hackers, and blockchain analysts to assist in tracking and freezing the stolen assets. All contributors will receive 10% of the final amount recovered. Speaking on the development, an Upbit representative said: “Customer assets affected by the attack have already been fully covered by Upbit assets, but we are persistently tracking and freezing them to prevent them from falling into the hands of attackers. We ask for active cooperation from virtual asset exchanges and the blockchain community around the world to create a safe virtual asset ecosystem”. Upbit said it has resumed deposit and withdrawal services for all assets on Dec. 6, following its wallet system replacement and security enhancements. next

Dregan AI Sets a New Standard for Meme Tokens With AI-Powered Utility

December 8th, 2025 – Minneapolis, United States Dregan AI Launches on Solana, Merging Meme Culture With Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence Dregan AI , the newest Solana-based innovation blending meme energy with real AI capability, officially announces its public launch. Designed to break the tired mold of utility-less meme tokens, Dregan AI introduces an ecosystem powered by intelligent agents, on-chain learning tools, and a community-driven approach to AI accessibility. Built on Solana to leverage its speed and scalability, Dregan AI is positioning itself as a meme-originated project transitioning into a functional AI assistant suite, offering holders access to tools that expand in capability in line with community engagement. A New Breed of Meme Token While most meme coins rely solely on hype, Dregan AI sets out to raise the standard. The project combines: AI-powered utility – personalized agents, meme generators, predictive insights, and community intelligence features Lightning-fast Solana infrastructure – low fees, rapid execution, and smooth user experience A character-driven brand – the Dregan persona acts as a mascot, guide, and evolving AI entity tied directly to holder engagement Transparent community governance – the project prioritizes open communication and verifiable development milestones Mission: Bringing AI to Everyone Dregan AI was created with a simple goal: to make advanced AI feel fun, accessible, and community-owned. Instead of gatekeeping innovation behind paywalls or big tech firms, Dregan AI decentralizes the experience — allowing everyday users to harness the power of intelligent tools through a token that lives on one of the fastest chains in crypto. Ecosystem Roadmap Dregan AI follows a three-phase roadmap designed to scale the project from core trading tools into a fully autonomous AI network. Phase 1 introduces the foundational systems—bots, alerts, staking, and the Alpha Terminal—to give users immediate utility. Phase 2 expands into advanced AI infrastructure with components like NeuraCore, Oracle+ System, Spectra Scan, and DynamicQ Engine, enabling deeper analysis and intelligent automation. Phase 3 focuses on dominance, unlocking high-level autonomous systems such as Apex Fusion Network, OmniSight Matrix, HyperFrame Nexus, and the ZeroPoint Engine. Together, these phases outline a clear path for Dregan AI to evolve into one of Solana’s most advanced AI ecosystems. A Growing Community on Solana Since its initial emergence, Dregan AI has generated notable traction on social platforms, drawing meme enthusiasts, builders, and early-stage AI adopters alike. The project embraces a culture of creativity, humor, and innovation — aiming to become the next breakout Solana community with real staying power. Statement from the Dregan AI Team “Crypto is evolving. Memes are evolving. AI is evolving. Dregan AI sits at the center of that shift. We’re building an ecosystem where fun and utility finally meet. The community will shape Dregan’s personality, capabilities, and long-term direction — and that’s what makes this project different.” – said Mark, Developer at Dregan AI How to Join the Movement Dregan AI is now live on Solana, with official links, tools, and community channels available for new supporters. Token Address: FBDBUPkifjpY5AzT8cHg9CKjJEwJqKfKdpCnHQq4mray About Dregan AI Dregan AI is a meme-powered artificial intelligence project built on the Solana blockchain. Created to merge entertainment with innovation, the ecosystem offers token-gated AI utilities, evolving character agents, and community-driven development. Dregan AI’s mission is to democratize AI in a fun, culturally relevant way that empowers users worldwide.

Shiba Inu's 23.56 Trillion Token Movement Likely a Data Error

A reported movement of 23.56 trillion SHIB tokens in a single 24-hour period has raised questions among cryptocurrency observers. The figure, sourced from CryptoQuant's on-chain tracking data, appears extraordinary at face value. However, a closer examination of market behaviour and supporting metrics suggests the number reflects a technical anomaly rather than genuine market activity. The sheer scale of the reported movement would typically trigger significant market reactions. Yet SHIB's price chart shows no corresponding volatility. The token continues to trade below its major moving averages, with no unusual price swings. At the time of writing, SHIB is trading at around $0.000008416, indicating a 0.71% decline over the last 24 hours and a 9.5% weekly drop. This disconnect between reported volume and actual market behaviour points toward data misclassification rather than a real event. SHIB price chart, Source: CoinMarketCap Market Shows No Signs of Massive Selling When billions of tokens actually reach exchanges and enter circulation, markets respond. Traders see expanded bid-ask spreads. Price charts display violent candlestick patterns. Liquidity pools show clear signs of strain. None of these indicators appear in SHIB's recent trading history. Trading volume remains within normal ranges. The price action shows typical consolidation patterns. No panic selling emerged. No sudden liquidity crunch occurred. The market is not pricing in a massive influx of new supply, which would be impossible to hide if trillions of tokens genuinely changed hands. Exchange metrics provide additional evidence against the headline figure. While CryptoQuant data shows both inflows and outflows spiking to extreme levels, 24.4 trillion SHIB flowing in and 25.2 trillion flowing out, these numbers contain red flags. The charts display vertical jumps that suggest technical glitches rather than organic market movements. Wallet Reorganization Explains the Numbers When both exchange inflows and outflows simultaneously register extreme values, internal wallet reorganization is usually the cause. Large holders regularly consolidate their positions across different wallets. Exchanges routinely move tokens between hot and cold storage. These internal transfers can trigger counting errors in blockchain tracking systems. API errors represent another common source of inflated volume figures. Data indexing bugs occasionally cause the same transaction to be counted multiple times. Consolidation events where multiple wallets merge into one can be misread as fresh market activity. Each scenario produces misleading volume statistics without actual tokens hitting the open market. Exchange reserve data supports this interpretation. The total amount of SHIB held on trading platforms has not shifted dramatically. If 23 trillion tokens genuinely moved to exchanges for selling, reserve balances would show a clear increase. They do not. Active address counts tell a similar story. The number of unique wallets interacting with SHIB has not spiked. A legitimate movement of this magnitude would involve thousands of active participants. The blockchain would show clear evidence of widespread activity. That evidence does not exist.

Stunning Bitcoin Whale Awakening: Dormant Addresses Move $178M After 13 Years

In a stunning move that has sent ripples through the cryptocurrency community, two legendary Bitcoin whale addresses have awoken from a 13-year slumber. According to data from Onchain-Lenz, these digital vaults, untouched since the early days of Bitcoin, transferred a colossal 2,000 BTC—worth approximately $178.29 million—to a new address. This event is not just a transaction; it’s a piece of blockchain history coming to life, prompting urgent questions about market impact and the motives behind this monumental shift. What Does This Massive Bitcoin Whale Movement Mean? When Bitcoin whale addresses of this vintage stir, the entire market pays attention. These specific addresses received their Bitcoin in 2013, a time when the network was in its infancy and the price was a fraction of today’s value. The sheer scale of this transfer, moving nearly $180 million in a single action, represents a significant potential supply shock. Analysts are now scrambling to interpret the signal. Is this a strategic sell-off, a portfolio reorganization, or simply the movement of assets to a more secure modern wallet? The intent behind the move from these specific Bitcoin whale addresses will dictate its short-term impact on liquidity and price sentiment. Why Are Dormant Coins So Significant? The movement of long-dormant coins is a rare and powerful on-chain metric. Think of these Bitcoin whale addresses as digital time capsules. Their inactivity for over a decade suggests the holders are original, patient investors—often called “HODLers.” Their decision to act now can be interpreted in several ways: Market Timing: The holder may believe a market top is near and is preparing to realize historic gains. Estate Planning: After 13 years, this could involve transferring wealth to heirs or a trust. Security Upgrade: Moving funds from an older, potentially vulnerable wallet to a new, more secure address. Institutional Action: The coins could be moving to a custody solution for a fund or corporate treasury. Each scenario carries different implications for whether these Bitcoins will hit the open market or simply change hands privately. How Could This Affect the Bitcoin Price? The immediate fear with any large movement from Bitcoin whale addresses is a sell-off that pressures the price. However, a transfer does not equal a sale. The key is tracking the destination address. If the 2,000 BTC moves to a known exchange deposit wallet, it strongly signals an impending sale, which could create downward pressure. Conversely, if it goes to another private, cold storage address, the market impact may be neutral or even positive, as it demonstrates continued long-term holding by a major player. This event serves as a crucial reminder of the power held within a few key Bitcoin whale addresses and their ability to influence market psychology. What Can Everyday Investors Learn From This? While most of us aren’t moving nine-figure sums, there are actionable insights from this whale activity. First, it highlights the incredible long-term value creation possible with Bitcoin. Second, it underscores the importance of secure, future-proof storage solutions. Finally, it teaches us to monitor on-chain data not for day-trading signals, but for understanding the behavior of the market’s most influential participants. Watching these Bitcoin whale addresses provides context, not a crystal ball. In conclusion, the awakening of these two dormant giants is a fascinating chapter in Bitcoin’s ongoing story. It connects the crypto present directly to its pioneering past. Whether this leads to market volatility or simply becomes a footnote, it reinforces Bitcoin’s narrative as a store of value that can be preserved across decades. The movement from these historic Bitcoin whale addresses is a powerful testament to the asset’s resilience and the patience of its earliest believers. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What exactly is a “Bitcoin whale”? A: A Bitcoin whale is an individual or entity that holds a large enough amount of Bitcoin that their transactions can potentially influence the market price. There’s no official threshold, but addresses holding thousands of BTC are universally considered whales. Q2: Why were these addresses dormant for 13 years? A: The holders likely acquired Bitcoin very early (around 2013) and chose a “HODL” strategy, meaning they bought and held through multiple market cycles without selling, possibly believing in its long-term potential as a digital gold. Q3: Does moving coins mean they are selling? A: Not necessarily. A transfer between private wallets is just a change of storage address. The key indicator of a sale is if the coins are sent to a deposit address at a cryptocurrency exchange. Q4: How can I track whale activity myself? A: You can use blockchain explorers or dedicated on-chain analytics platforms, which often highlight large and unusual transactions. Q5: Should I be worried about whale sales? A: While large sales can cause short-term price dips, Bitcoin’s market is now more liquid and institutionalized than ever. Whale movements are one factor among many, including macroeconomic trends and adoption rates. Q6: What’s the largest Bitcoin whale transaction ever recorded? A: Some of the largest involve transfers between wallets controlled by exchanges or institutional custodians. Single movements of tens of thousands of BTC have occurred, often related to internal reorganizations rather than individual sales. Did this deep dive into the stunning movement of dormant Bitcoin whales help you understand the market better? If you found this analysis valuable, share this article on your social media to spark a conversation with fellow crypto enthusiasts about the power of on-chain data and long-term holding strategies! To learn more about the latest Bitcoin trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action and institutional adoption.

Bitcoin Under Pressure Following BlackRock’s $125M BTC Move

BlackRock transferred $125 million in Bitcoin to Coinbase, increasing market uncertainty. Bitcoin fails to break $94,000 resistance after multiple attempts. Bitcoin trading is still very volatile after a massive move from institutions that has scared the investors on different global exchanges in the last few trading sessions. On-chain metrics are pointing to a further drop in price before the digital asset can regain a bullish trend. Investors are paying extreme attention to the fundamental levels of support that will possibly signal the Bitcoin price movement in the following few days. Institutional Activity Heightens Market Pressure Bitcoin’s fight to keep its upward trend going beyond important levels was made even more difficult after BlackRock carried out a large transfer of digital assets worth roughly $125 million to the Coinbase exchange. The moment of this move, combined with the worsening of the market, made the traders take more cautious positions because they were very uncertain about the institutional intentions. The digital asset is trading close to $89,250 after several failed attempts to break through the resistance area of $94,000, which has been strong in the last few sessions. On each occasion, the rally has been met with determined selling, thus there has been no result in any continued upward movement, and the bearish sentiment has been strengthened among those active market participants who are watching closely. The market strain has been augmented by the latest U.S. inflation data showing the PCE index going up to 2.8%, which led to a decrease in risk appetite across financial markets. This macroeconomic development has been a major factor behind the deepening of liquidity conditions, which, in turn, has made it very hard for buyers to raise prices even though there is some buying interest. From a technical standpoint, there are troubling signs that point to the possibility of the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization facing further losses in the near future. The asset is moving within a bearish pennant flag formation, which is a continuation pattern that generally indicates further drops if it is accompanied by a sharp decline in price. The Parabolic SAR instrument reveals that the dots are placed above the existing price movement, thus affirming that the sellers are the ones who have a firm grip over the prevailing trend direction. At the same time, the Directional Movement Index shows negative directional strength at 25, slightly above positive directional strength at 24, which means that there is still a dominating selling pressure. Market analysts have turned their attention to the $88,000 level as the next major point of testing. If the price were to break down from there, it could possibly lead Bitcoin to drift towards $84,000 where it is believed that a more solid support level may be present. From there on, the lower area might be able to offer the base required for any substantial bounce back. However, the present situation is still not very comfortable for those traders and investors who want to take risks. Highlighted Crypto News Today: Strategy Raises $1.44B to Combat Investor Concerns During Bitcoin Downturn

Bitcoin Price Plummets: BTC Falls Below $92,000 in Market Shakeup

In a significant market movement, the Bitcoin price has fallen below the critical $92,000 threshold, currently trading at $91,960.01 on Binance’s USDT market. This drop has sent ripples through the cryptocurrency community, prompting investors to ask: what’s driving this decline, and what comes next? What Does the Current Bitcoin Price Movement Mean? The recent dip in the Bitcoin price below $92,000 represents more than just a numerical change. It signals potential shifts in market sentiment and trader behavior. According to Bitcoin World market monitoring, this movement reflects broader trends affecting cryptocurrency valuations. However, experienced traders understand that such fluctuations are normal in volatile markets. Several factors typically influence the Bitcoin price: Market sentiment and investor psychology Global economic conditions and regulatory news Trading volume and liquidity on major exchanges Technical indicators and resistance levels Why Should You Care About This Price Drop? Whether you’re a seasoned trader or new to cryptocurrency, understanding Bitcoin price movements is crucial for making informed decisions. This particular drop below $92,000 serves as a reminder of cryptocurrency’s inherent volatility. However, it also presents potential opportunities for those who understand market cycles. Historical data shows that Bitcoin has experienced numerous corrections throughout its history, often followed by periods of recovery. The current Bitcoin price action should be viewed in context rather than isolation. Market analysts suggest considering these key aspects: Long-term versus short-term investment strategies Portfolio diversification approaches Risk management techniques Fundamental versus technical analysis How Can Investors Navigate This Bitcoin Price Volatility? Navigating the Bitcoin price volatility requires a balanced approach. First, avoid making emotional decisions based on short-term movements. Instead, focus on your investment thesis and risk tolerance. Many successful investors use dollar-cost averaging to mitigate timing risks during volatile periods. Second, stay informed about market developments that might affect the Bitcoin price. Regulatory announcements, institutional adoption news, and macroeconomic factors all play significant roles. Third, consider setting clear entry and exit points based on your investment goals rather than reacting to every price fluctuation. What’s Next for the Bitcoin Price? Predicting the exact future Bitcoin price remains challenging, but analyzing current trends provides valuable insights. The $92,000 level now becomes a psychological resistance point that traders will watch closely. Market participants will monitor whether this represents a temporary correction or the beginning of a larger trend. Technical analysts typically examine support and resistance levels, trading volume patterns, and market structure when assessing potential Bitcoin price directions. Fundamental analysts consider adoption metrics, network activity, and macroeconomic conditions. Combining these approaches often provides the most comprehensive view. In conclusion, the Bitcoin price dropping below $92,000 serves as both a cautionary tale and a potential opportunity. Market volatility is an inherent characteristic of cryptocurrency investing. Successful navigation requires education, discipline, and perspective. Remember that price movements represent just one aspect of Bitcoin’s evolving story as a transformative technology and asset class. Frequently Asked Questions What caused Bitcoin to fall below $92,000? The Bitcoin price decline likely results from a combination of factors including profit-taking after recent gains, changing market sentiment, and broader economic conditions affecting risk assets. Should I sell my Bitcoin after this price drop? Investment decisions should align with your financial goals and risk tolerance rather than reacting to short-term price movements. Many investors maintain long-term positions through market cycles. How low could the Bitcoin price go? While predictions vary, Bitcoin has established historical support levels that analysts monitor. The current market structure will determine whether this is a minor correction or a more significant trend change. Is this a good time to buy Bitcoin? Some investors view price dips as potential buying opportunities, particularly if they believe in Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition. However, timing the market perfectly remains extremely difficult. What indicators should I watch for Bitcoin price recovery? Key indicators include trading volume increases, positive news flow, technical breakouts above resistance levels, and improved market sentiment across cryptocurrency markets. How does this Bitcoin price movement compare to historical patterns? Bitcoin has experienced numerous corrections throughout its history, often followed by periods of consolidation and eventual new highs. Current movements remain within historical volatility parameters. Found this analysis helpful? Share this article with fellow cryptocurrency enthusiasts on your social media channels to help others understand the current Bitcoin price dynamics and market developments. To learn more about the latest Bitcoin trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Bitcoin price action and institutional adoption.

LayerBank Secures $2.3M in Pre-Seed Funding Ahead of ULAB Token Launch on Movement Network

December 5th, 2025 – Seoul, South Korea LayerBank has raised $2.3M in its Pre-Seed round, backed by leading builders and strategic partners shaping the next era of decentralized finance. Participants in the round include Torab Torabi (CEO of Move Industries), Coin Bureau Chinese, DVchain, Taiko, Rootstock, and several prominent angels and ecosystem contributors. The new capital fuels the development and launch of ULAB, LayerBank’s native token and the foundation of the platform’s long-term value capture and incentive model. Built with ve-boosted rewards, fee-driven value distribution, and sustained buyback-and-lock mechanisms, ULAB is designed to align user participation with the growth of the platform from day one. In parallel, the funding enables LayerBank to advance its roadmap of intuitive, automated, user-centric DeFi products-allowing users to access sophisticated yield strategies through simple, seamless interfaces. LayerBank’s Token Generation Event (TGE) will be hosted on Movement Network, making it one of the first ecosystem token launches on the network. This collaboration reflects a shared commitment to advancing DeFi innovation and expanding access to deep markets, stable borrowing conditions, and intuitive lending flows for users on Movement. Ray, CEO of LayerBank, commented: “We’re thrilled to complete our first fundraising round and accelerate the rollout of products that are intuitive, automated, and genuinely useful for everyday users. ULAB will serve as the economic engine of the LayerBank ecosystem, and this milestone brings us closer to unlocking the full potential of our incentive and value-accrual design.”Torab Torabi, CEO of Move Industries added: “LayerBank represents the type of perseverance and loyalty that’s needed to succeed for both an app and for an ecosystem. Although LayerBank is live across multiple chains, they ultimately decided to call Movement, ‘The People’s Chain,’ home. ULAB sets a strong precedent for how projects should approach value accrual back to users, especially in DeFi. We’re proud of LayerBank’s vision and excited to see them bring deep liquidity, RWA access, and intuitive lending products to the Movement ecosystem.” About LayerBank LayerBank is the universal liquidity and on-chain money market powering the next era of decentralized finance. Supporting 150+ markets across 17+ chains, including EVM, MOVE, and BTC-based ecosystems, LayerBank delivers frictionless lending, borrowing, and advanced yield strategies through a unified, chain-abstracted experience. With a community of 693,000+ users, LayerBank enables scalable liquidity, capital efficiency, and real yield across both DeFi and RWA markets. About Movement Network Movement Network (The People’s Chain) is a secure and scalable blockchain designed to make Move programming accessible to developers everywhere. With high-performance execution and security, Movement delivers the infrastructure for the next generation of decentralized applications and unleashes opportunity and financial empowerment for anyone, anywhere. About Move Industries Move Industries is building a community-first Move-based blockchain ecosystem. Led by a team of industry veterans, Move Industries maintains a dual focus on technology and community. The organization intends to return to crypto’s radical roots: giving financial power and opportunity back to the people. Contact

CryptoCap Charts Reveal 4 Key Turns as Decline Slows Near the Lower Band

The chart shows repeated curved lows that formed at equal distances which shaped a steady base inside the channel. The decline created a clear structure with a wide pathway that guided every turn from the upper edge to the lower edge. The current move shifts toward the upper line which may signal a change if price moves beyond the boundary. The crypto market, excluding major assets, showed a steady move after forming repeated curved lows inside a wide decline channel. The pattern appeared on daily and twelve-hour charts where the structure mirrored earlier swings that shaped the previous advance from the same zone. The channel held the full decline while every turn moved between the upper line and the lower line with clear symmetry. 🚨 SAME STRUCTURE? 🤔 Could it be the same playbook? ⚠️ Back in February a capitulation was followed by a further downtrend before a breakout in $OTHERS , if bulls want a repeat of history, it needs to reverse soon 👀 December Pivot? 🎅🏻 pic.twitter.com/q3mttwem4m — CRYPTOWZRD (@cryptoWZRD_) December 2, 2025 Repeated Curved Lows Shape a Recognizable Pattern The chart displayed 3 curved lows in the older phase of the decline. Each turn formed near the lower edge of the channel and aligned with the base from the previous cycle. The repeated shapes indicated steady reactions at the same distance from the upper boundary. A new set of curved lows formed in the recent phase of the market. The pattern followed the same method seen earlier with a clean arc at each return to the lower region. The spacing between these arcs matched the earlier sequence which gave the structure a consistent look. The full decline channel carried both phases with the same slope. The lower boundary acted as the demand zone while the upper boundary formed the region where advances paused. The present move lifts the market from the latest curved structure and follows the same path seen during the earlier rise. Channel Structure Shows Clear Movement Between Boundaries The channel contained every swing of the market since the large decline at the start of the chart. The upper line guided all downward turns while the lower line supported each arc. Every bounce moved toward the midline before returning to the lower boundary. The chart showed the most recent move beginning from a curved base that matched the arcs formed earlier. The upward path aims toward the midline where past swings paused briefly. The projected path on the chart shows a possible move toward the upper boundary if the current advance continues. The market cap levels printed on the right axis show the full range of movement inside the channel. The earlier cycle moved from the lower boundary toward the upper boundary before reversing. The present setup follows the same shape with the potential to repeat the earlier rise. Potential Upper Break Comes Into View as Momentum Builds The structure on the right panel shows the market now approaching the slope that limits all advances. The dashed extension on the chart marks a possible break beyond the channel if the upward leg remains intact. Such a move would match the earlier reversal that followed the first decline. The move also mirrors the earlier recovery that lifted the market from the curved base in the older cycle. The chart shows how the market climbed from the same arc position and followed the channel shape before breaking out. The current path begins from the same form, which creates a similar setup. The channel slope remains intact and guides the full structure. The next test comes as price approaches the upper region that controlled each swing since the decline started. The question now emerges for traders: Will the market break the upper line and begin a shift toward a stronger phase?

Stablecoins in the Wild: When Fintech Discovers Programmable Money

This article is authored by Arthur Firstov, the Chief Business Officer at Mercuryo, a global leader in crypto payments infrastructure. Arthur is a recognized voice on stablecoins, digital banking, and the convergence of web3 and traditional finance – and this article is based on his insights from partnerships with more than 300 companies, including Circle, Coinbase, Mastercard, Revolut, and Polymarket. As the digital assets market matures beyond speculation, a new phase of global finance is emerging, one defined by interoperability, compliance, and inclusion. Speaking at Token2049 Singapore 2025, Arthur Firstov outlined how the next evolution of financial systems is closing the gap between decentralized finance (DeFi) and traditional financial institutions. The conversation focused on a simple idea with big implications: the worlds of crypto and mainstream finance are no longer parallel universes. They are converging to build accessible, efficient, and transparent global markets for both institutional and retail participants. A Payment Layer for the Digital-Asset Era “Stablecoins are becoming the new fintech,” says Firstov, who believes that in the next few years, every fintech company will, in effect, be a stablecoin company. The data supports this trajectory. Recent research shows that stablecoin transfers for payments have already reached roughly $19.4 billion year-to-date in 2025 and are on pace to surpass $1 trillion annually by 2030, just for the emerging payments use cases, not speculative trading. At the same time, McKinsey now estimates that total stablecoin transaction volume across all use cases has already topped $27 trillion a year, putting it on a potential path to overtake legacy networks before the decade is out. That growth highlights how quickly the narrative has shifted from “crypto trading” to “digital settlement rails.” “In practice, the experience is seamless. Users can buy digital assets with a debit card or Apple Pay, convert them into stablecoins, send value globally in seconds, and cash out to a bank account,” Firstov explains. Behind that simplicity is an expanding network of wallets, fintechs, and global payment rails working together to power instant, borderless transfers, the foundation of a new digital-asset settlement layer for the modern economy. From Skepticism to Scale: Klarna, Tempo and the New Rails One of the clearest signals that this shift is real comes from names that, until recently, had nothing to do with crypto. In late 2025, Swedish digital bank Klarna, best known for its “buy now, pay later” services, announced KlarnaUSD, its first U.S.-dollar stablecoin, built on Tempo, a new payments-focused blockchain developed by Stripe and Paradigm. KlarnaUSD is issued via Bridge’s Open Issuance platform (a Stripe company) and is currently live in test mode, with a full launch on Tempo’s mainnet planned for 2026. Klarna explicitly frames the move as a way to: – Bypass expensive, slow cross-border payment routes– Tap into a $120 billion annual cross-border fee pool– Serve over 100 million existing customers on cheaper, programmable rails For Firstov, this kind of partnership is exactly what “closing the gap” looks like in practice: “When a digital bank like Klarna launches a stablecoin on a dedicated payments blockchain, the story is no longer ‘crypto people sending tokens to each other.’ It is mainstream payment companies quietly rewriting their settlement stack on top of stablecoin rails.” Moves like KlarnaUSD on Tempo sit in the same category as PayPal’s PYUSD and other institution-led experiments: they are early, controlled, and compliance-heavy, but they reveal where the industry expects the real growth to come from. Who Is Using It and Why “The digital-assets audience usually consists of blockchain enthusiasts and developers driving innovation in the space,” Firstov says. But he adds that the user base now extends far beyond tech insiders: – Digital nomads managing income across borders– People with families abroad sending remittances– Aspiring founders and freelancers getting paid globally– More sophisticated users exploring new digital-asset products and yield opportunities This variety of users reflects the growing diversity in access. In Latin America and Southeast Asia, where local currencies often face severe volatility, stablecoins are increasingly used as everyday banking alternatives rather than speculative assets. Figure: Survey results comparing web3 wallets with traditional payment apps (Protocol Theory 2025). The macro numbers underline the shift. The global stablecoin supply has pushed past $300 billion, signaling that this is no longer a niche segment. Meanwhile, new research from Protocol Theory (in partnership with Mercuryo) shows that in the U.S. only 12 percent of adults feel web3 wallets fit their lives, compared with 64 percent for traditional digital wallets. That gap highlights both the remaining friction and the size of the opportunity to make self-custodial experiences as intuitive as the apps people already use every day. Liquidity, Infrastructure and Market Movement “The real battlefield today is infrastructure,” Firstov insists. “It does not matter which chain you use; what matters is that the rails work around the clock, globally.” Recent reports back this up: payment volumes in B2B stablecoin settlements jumped from under $100 million per month in early 2023 to more than $3 billion monthly in early 2025. That kind of growth demands serious plumbing: – Multi-chain settlement– Real-time routing– Robust global compliance and sanctions screening– Institutional-grade custody and auditability This is where examples like KlarnaUSD on Tempo are instructive. Tempo is purpose-built for payments, and Klarna is using it not as a marketing gimmick, but as a way to lower settlement costs for merchants and users at scale. Meanwhile, institutions are waking up more broadly. Tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) could reach $2 trillion by 2028, with stablecoins acting as the underlying “plumbing” that moves value between markets and instruments. Firstov points to ETF-style flows, digital asset token (DAT) liquidity channels, and regulated rails as early previews of what is coming next. The “Golden Era” for Users “We are stepping into the golden era for users,” Firstov says. “The biggest financial institutions and blockchain platforms are now competing for distribution. As a result, users can access new financial products and markets, from stablecoins to tokenized assets, with fees near zero and almost no premium.” That is a bold claim, but the numbers give it weight. Cost reductions of up to 99 percent have been reported in cross-border transfers using stablecoin rails compared to legacy correspondent banking. And as Klarna, PayPal, Stripe, Revolut and others deploy stablecoin-based rails, the playing field is shifting from early adopters to global scale. In effect, users are getting the upside of institutional competition: cheaper transfers, faster settlement, and access to new products, while the heavy lifting happens behind the scenes in infrastructure. Final Take Arthur Firstov and his peers are operating at a rare inflection point. The merging of DeFi, stablecoins, and institutional finance signals a future where money moves anytime, anywhere, instantly, and cheaply. What once looked like two separate universes, crypto on one side and banks and fintechs on the other, is rapidly becoming a single, programmable financial fabric. KlarnaUSD on Tempo is one concrete example; the next wave will bring more banks, more stablecoins, and more tokenized assets onto similar rails. As the underlying infrastructure matures, liquidity deepens, and regulatory clarity expands, the promise of programmable money is no longer theoretical. The mission now is not just innovation but inclusion, ensuring that from retail users in Argentina to hedge funds in New York, everyone can plug into the same digital-asset economy.

JUST Price Prediction: Breakout Stalls As Sellers Test Support After Parabolic Rally

JUST price today trades near $0.0425, easing over 3% in the past 24 hours after a strong breakout that lifted price into a major multi-month resistance zone. The rally paused immediately at the upper boundary of a long-term triangle formation, leading to profit-taking as the market tests whether the breakout has real follow-through. Price Hits Major Resistance After Strong Rally JST Price Prediction (Source: TradingView) The daily chart shows JUST breaking above a rising wedge base and driving into the horizontal ceiling near $0.0440, which has capped every major rally since April. Price remains above all major EMAs, which now sit between $0.0348 and $0.0388, establishing a broad support zone beneath current levels. The reclaim of the EMA stack is structurally bullish, but the reaction at resistance determines whether the breakout transitions into trend expansion or stalls into consolidation. RSI sits near 74, signaling overbought conditions and increasing risk of short-term cooling. The indicator also shows repeated bearish divergence signals on previous peaks, making the current stall notable as traders gauge whether momentum will fade again. A failure to hold above the rising support line drawn from the late October low exposes a deeper pullback toward the EMA cluster. Intraday Charts Show Initial Retest Of Support JST Price Action (Source: TradingView) On the 30-minute chart, JUST is testing the rising trendline that supported the breakout. Price briefly slipped below the line before reclaiming it, showing early signs of bid absorption. Supertrend sits overhead at $0.0437, reinforcing that upside is encountering resistance. The Directional Movement Index shows a fading bullish impulse, with ADX flattening while +DI slips beneath related metrics. This supports the idea that momentum has cooled and the rally is transitioning into a retest phase. A close below the trendline would shift focus toward the $0.0410 to $0.0395 region, where early support formed before the breakout acceleration. Spot Flows Show Light Distribution JST Netflows (Source: Coinglass) Spot flow data shows a small $211,000 outflow on December 2, reflecting mild distribution after the breakout. Recent days show a mix of green and red prints, indicating balanced participation rather than heavy accumulation or aggressive profit-taking. This flow profile matches price action. The rally was driven by technical breakout mechanics rather than large-scale inflow, and the current stall reflects traders managing risk rather than exiting en masse. If spot flows turn positive again, the breakout could regain momentum. Sustained outflows would indicate further cooling. Outlook. Will JUST Go Up? JUST remains in a constructive higher timeframe structure after reclaiming the full EMA stack and breaking out from a multi-week base. The current pullback is a standard retest of resistance turned potential support. The next move depends on whether buyers defend that level. Bullish case: A bounce from $0.0410 followed by a close above $0.0440 signals continuation toward $0.0460 and $0.0500. Sustained higher lows confirm trend expansion. Bearish case: A break below $0.0410 turns the move into a deeper retracement toward $0.0395 and potentially $0.0380. Losing the EMA stack shifts structure back into range-bound behavior. JUST must hold the rising support to maintain the breakout thesis. Reclaiming $0.0440 turns the pullback into trend continuation, while losing $0.0410 exposes a cooldown toward the mid-$0.03 area.

Renowned Crypto Influencer Embroiled in "Donation Fraudgate," Accused of Faking Hong Kong Fire Donation Receipt, Sparking Public Outcry

A serious fire at Wang Fuk House in Tai Po, Hong Kong, has caused hundreds of casualties and property damage. Charitable organizations such as Yan Chai Hospital promptly set up an emergency relief fund to support the affected residents. The cryptocurrency industry has also seen many companies and individuals providing assistance, including industry giants like Binance and Matrixport donating millions of Hong Kong dollars. However, on December 1, a prominent figure in the cryptocurrency community, known as KOL @Elizabethofyou, found herself embroiled in a "Donation Fraud" scandal when the community noticed that the proof of her HK$200,000 donation appeared to be photoshopped. A "Expose the Fraud" Movement Triggered by a Screenshot On December 1, Elizabeth, a cryptocurrency influencer with 130,000 followers, posted a tweet on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter), stating that she had donated HK$200,000 to Yan Chai Hospital to support the victims of the Tai Po fire. The tweet included a screenshot of the transaction confirmation and a caption urging others to "show kindness in the face of disaster." The act of kindness quickly garnered over 600,000 views and 1500 likes, initially being seen as a demonstration of positive energy in the industry. However, public opinion took a sharp turn within hours. Several members of the crypto community on the Twitter platform, such as @CryptoNyaRu and @abyssofgambling, analyzed the screenshot and pointed out multiple suspicious elements: 1. Irregular Font: The number "2" in the amount "200,000" in the screenshot had a noticeably thinner font, inconsistent with the font style of the "Annual Donation Hotline" number below. 2. Misalignment: The amount line and the text below could not be aligned, showing a significant discrepancy in pixel height typical of image editing software (such as Photoshop) manipulation. The suspicions quickly escalated, turning the likes into dislikes. The community believed that if this was indeed a fraud, using a significant tragedy to deceive people's compassion was incredibly heinous, and they hoped Elizabeth could provide evidence to prove the authenticity of her donation. Response from the Involved Party and Escalation of Public Opinion Faced with overwhelming doubts, Elizabeth released a response video on the evening of the 1st. In the video, she insisted that she had "donated with a clear conscience" and stated that this would be her final response. She then displayed another screenshot as evidence. This screenshot is different from the first one. The phone number is different, and the video demonstration is of a static webpage without dynamic refreshing. Additionally, netizens believe that the evidence she provided is not convincing as there is no bank transaction record or an official receipt from Renji Hospital. After releasing a response, Elizabeth ignored numerous requests for self-verification in the comments and continued to post commercial ad tweets. This handling of the situation further enraged the public. According to the Hong Kong Theft Ordinance, if misleading the public through false statements to gain benefits (including advertising collaboration opportunities due to traffic, brand image enhancement, etc.), it may constitute "fraud" or "obtaining property by deception." Upon conviction for such offenses, the maximum penalty can be 10 to 14 years of imprisonment. Netizens have started reaching out to donation organizations for verification and believe that if the fraudulent donation is confirmed, there should be legal consequences. Some Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) have also compared donation verification evidence for authenticity. As of now, there has been no latest response from donation organizations regarding Elizabeth. Historical Warning: The Cost of Celebrity "Donation Fraud" Using charity for false publicity is not uncommon in the history of public figures. One of the most famous cases is international actress Zhang Ziyi. During the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Zhang Ziyi claimed to donate 1 million RMB. However, in 2010, netizens discovered that the actual amount received was only 840,000 RMB, and the whereabouts of the millions of dollars she claimed to have raised in Cannes were unknown. After the incident broke out, Zhang Ziyi's public image plummeted, facing an unprecedented crisis of trust. Eventually, her agent apologized for "management negligence," made up the shortfall, and hired an auditing firm to audit and disclose the foundation's accounts. Despite taking remedial measures, the "donation fraud" label followed her for many years. In 2015, well-known actress Yang Mi promised to donate typewriters and white canes to a special education school in Chengdu while promoting the movie "I Am a Witness." However, it wasn't until 2018 that the school stated they never received the supplies. Yang Mi's studio explained that it was due to the negligence of an "intermediary" that the donation was not fulfilled, and they promptly donated the supplies and publicly apologized. Although it was not legally classified as fraud, the incident was characterized by the public as "hypocritical," greatly undermining her integrity as a public figure.