Tokenization of markets: The IMF warns of 5 major risks not to be ignored
Tokenization stirs the backstage of global finance. Presented as the next wave of innovation, it could attract millions of investors and billions of dollars in the coming years. Between traditional banks, crypto start-ups and regulators, bets are mounting on the shape this new ecosystem will take. The International Monetary Fund, meanwhile, steps into the arena with a more cautious message: yes, tokenization changes the game. But it also brings systemic risks that must not be underestimated.
In brief
- Tokenization promises efficiency gains, but can trigger rapid and uncontrollable collapses.
- The lack of interoperability between digital platforms weakens liquidity and blocks exchanges of tokenized assets.
- Automated markets amplify volatility, making crashes more frequent and difficult to contain.
- States, alerted, prepare their comeback to regulate this programmable finance and prevent systemic abuses.
Tokenization & finance: the speed that weakens
With tokenization, everything becomes faster: transactions, settlements, executions. The promises are huge. No more intermediaries nor banking delays. BlackRock, through its BUIDL fund , and Franklin Templeton have understood this well: they tokenize U.S. Treasury bonds, reap the gains and boost efficiency.
But the IMF pulls the emergency brake . This speed could trigger flash crashes more violent than ever. Coded automations forgive nothing: in case of bug or panic, markets fall before a human even has time to react.
The IMF warns: stacked one on top of the other, smart contracts can fall like digital dominos. This local imbalance could then turn into a global shock, instantly spreading throughout the entire tokenized system.
Automation is formidable. It pushes to maximum speed, but without a safety net. And when machines dictate the rules, flaws can become systemic. The challenge is no longer technical, but structural: how to slow down a market launched at full speed?
Isolated platforms: the fracture of tokenization
In the collective imagination, tokenization evokes a fluid world, without barriers. Yet, reality is far more fragmented. Each player — bank, start-up or DAO — builds its own architecture. Result: technological islands unable to communicate with each other.
The IMF and IOSCO worry about this missing interoperability. Platforms that “do not talk to each other” cause a depletion of global liquidity, with assets blocked, distorted prices, and reduced efficiency.
As the specialized media The Paypers points out:
Interoperability is an important point. There is still a lot of work to be done in this area.
This fragmentation even affects stablecoins, though they are presented as the pillars of digital finance. Each applies its own rules: reserve, audit, convertibility. Result: confusion, duplicates, and growing mistrust.
And what about disputes? If two platforms tokenize the same asset differently, who truly owns it? Without shared standards, legal security wavers. And in finance, insecurity means crisis.
States on the scene: regulation lying in wait for tokenized finance
Tokenization does not exist in a vacuum. It is part of a monetary history marked by state interventions. From the Bretton Woods system to the collapse of the gold standard in the 1970s, every mutation saw governments regain control.
Today, the IMF reminds us that history could repeat itself:
Governments have rarely contented themselves with remaining on the sidelines during major monetary shifts.
Behind the scenes, JPMorgan and Citi are already refining their own private tokens. JPM Coin enables continuous transfers on the blockchain, 24/7, while Citi Token Services is moving towards closed B2B applications. No anarchy here. But private, centralized finance in the hands of giants.
Will tokenized finance be a decentralized utopia or a technological remake of dominant institutions? If the state enters the arena, the answer could quickly lean towards strict regulations, licenses, and imposed safeguards.
The 5 major dangers according to the IMF and IOSCO
- Amplified flash crashes: automation and speed create uncontrollable mini-crashes;
- Extreme volatility: absence of immediate mitigation mechanisms;
- Lack of interoperability: incompatible platforms, liquidity bottleneck;
- Legal risks: ambiguity over the actual ownership of digital assets;
- Imminent state intervention: increased surveillance and regulation.
Tokenized markets represent more than just a technological turning point. They rewrite the rules of investment by transforming rigid assets into fluid, divisible, and accessible instruments for all. Tokenization of RWA could well become the link between traditional economy and a programmable future. Provided this new bridge is secured before it falters under its own weight.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Zcash News Today: Crypto’s Schism: Doubt in L1s Contrasted with Growth at the Application Layer
- QwQiao critiques speculative L1 tokens (e.g., Bitcoin , Ethereum) for scalability issues and volatile valuations, contrasting them with utility-driven application-layer innovations. - Application-layer projects like DeFi, NFTs, and privacy-focused Zcash (ZEC) gain traction via real-world use cases, exemplified by Grayscale's ZEC ETF and Bitcoin Munari's structured token sales. - Dynamic tokenomics and institutional adoption (e.g., Ripple's RLUSD approval) highlight shifting priorities toward sustainable

Solana News Today: GeeFi's Presale Skyrockets Amid 2025 AI Surge, Attracting Investors with Promises of 3,000% Returns
- GeeFi's (GEE) Phase 2 presale surges with 10M tokens sold, offering 3,000% ROI forecasts vs. struggling Layer-1 rivals like Avalanche and Solana . - GEE's 20% phase-based pricing model (currently $0.06) targets $0.40 listing, with experts projecting 4,900% returns if it reaches $3/token. - The project's non-custodial wallet, DEX, and 55% APY staking, plus VISA/Mastercard crypto card partnerships, differentiate it from speculative crypto peers. - Market shifts toward utility-driven solutions accelerate as

Bitcoin Updates: Bitcoin’s Financial Infrastructure Sets the Stage for an ETF-Fueled Bull Market
- BlackRock deposited $422M in BTC/ETH to Coinbase Prime, signaling institutional-driven Bitcoin liquidity growth and ETF adoption. - Nasdaq's 40x IBIT options expansion is seen as structural catalyst for institutional capital deployment and Bitcoin's all-time high potential. - Mixed on-chain metrics show $90k retest but weak liquidity above $84k, with weekend volatility and short-covering limiting sustained bullish momentum. - Market awaits confirmation of BlackRock's $85.3k support hold and Fed rate deci

Solana News Update: Institutional Interest Drives Solana ETFs Higher, While Token Value Declines
- CoinShares withdrew its staked SOL ETF application due to uncompleted structuring deals, complicating crypto ETF development in the U.S. - Competitors like Bitwise and Franklin Templeton launched successful staked SOL ETFs, amassing $918M in assets despite SOL's price stagnation below $150. - ETF inflows contrast with SOL's weak price action, hindered by technical issues and a bearish death cross pattern near $130 support level. - Institutional confidence persists through accumulation, but macroeconomic

