Ripple USDの‌価格RLUSD

JP MORGAN TEAMS UP WITH RIPPLE-BACKED INFRA JP Morgan Payments has partnered with Ripple-owned GTreasury to power global payment netting for Franklin Electric ($2.1B market cap). The system offsets intercompany balances, reducing: • FX costs • Bank friction • Settlement delays As JP Morgan’s Owen Biglin put it: “Driving smarter, more cost-effective cross-border payments.” With Ripple’s blockchain rails ($XRP / $RLUSD) in the stack, this is TradFi quietly moving real money onto crypto-powered infrastructure.🔥

Markets are often efficient at pricing narratives, but far less reliable at valuing infrastructure. History shows that foundational technologies tend to look stagnant before they become indispensable. In crypto, where attention gravitates toward rapid price swings, long-term architecture frequently develops outside the spotlight, creating a widening gap between perception and underlying progress. That gap is precisely what X Finance Bull addressed in a recent post on X, arguing that XRP’s current valuation does not accurately represent the role it is being positioned to play in the evolving global payments system. Rather than viewing XRP through a speculative lens, the analyst frames it as a core liquidity component in a network that is still being understood by the broader market. If the market were rational, $XRP wouldn’t still be cheap 🚨🚨🚨 A global value network is unfolding and it sounds a lot like Interledger. Neutral liquidity. Tokenized assets. Fiat-to-fiat without friction. Ripple didn’t wait to build this. XRPL already fits the model. RLUSD… https://t.co/xW0xEzDieM pic.twitter.com/Lsq0DNG9Mk — X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) December 27, 2025 Interoperability Is Becoming the New Standard Global finance is steadily moving toward interoperability, where value flows seamlessly across different ledgers, currencies, and asset types. Interledger, Ripple’s protocol for connecting disparate payment networks, closely mirrors this direction. Its design enables neutral liquidity, allowing assets to move across systems without forcing participants into a single blockchain or currency. This model aligns with the growing push toward tokenized assets and real-time settlement. As financial institutions explore blockchain-based infrastructure, the ability to connect legacy systems with digital rails is becoming more important than isolated performance metrics. XRPL Was Built for This Environment The XRP Ledger was not adapted to meet emerging institutional requirements; it was engineered with them in mind. Its fast finality, low transaction costs, and built-in decentralized exchange make it suitable for high-volume, cross-border value transfer. These characteristics support XRP’s use as a bridge asset, particularly in scenarios where direct fiat pairs are illiquid or inefficient. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 According to X Finance Bull, this structural readiness explains why XRP continues to be referenced in discussions around global settlement architecture, even when its market price appears disconnected from that narrative. RLUSD and Live Payment Corridors Ripple’s launch of RLUSD in December 2024 added another operational layer to this ecosystem. The dollar-backed stablecoin is already active within payment corridors, supporting regulated fiat settlement while working alongside XRP rather than replacing it. This approach reinforces XRP’s role as neutral liquidity within multi-currency flows. Meanwhile, broader financial rails are evolving. ISO 20022 adoption across banking systems and ongoing SWIFT infrastructure upgrades signal a shift toward richer data and faster settlement. While XRP is not part of SWIFT, its compatibility with these standards positions it to integrate with, rather than disrupt, existing financial networks. Why the Market May Be Missing the Signal X Finance Bull emphasizes that price often lags utility when the infrastructure is early. Markets tend to reward visible demand before structural importance becomes obvious. In that context, accumulation during periods of consolidation is framed not as momentum trading, but as positioning alongside a foundation still being laid. The argument is not that XRP’s value is guaranteed, but that its architecture is increasingly aligned with where global finance is heading. For long-term holders, the message is simple: volatility reflects sentiment, while infrastructure reflects intent—and the two rarely move in sync. Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

Ripple’s ongoing sales of XRP have long been a point of discussion within the cryptocurrency community. A senior executive has now outlined conditions under which the company could reduce or potentially halt these sales. Ripple initially received an allocation of 80 billion XRP. To fund its operations, the company has periodically sold portions of these holdings on the open market. In 2017, Ripple implemented an escrow system that locked up 55 billion XRP and scheduled the release of 1 billion tokens per month. From these releases, a fraction was sold to support operational expenses. Over time, the escrow structure was adjusted, allowing up to 80% of the released tokens, approximately 800 million XRP, to be sold if necessary. These sales, however, have been a recurring concern for investors, with some arguing that steady liquidation pressures can negatively affect XRP’s market price. While these worries have eased in recent years, especially after analyses showed XRP largely tracks broader crypto market trends, periods of market weakness tend to reignite debates over Ripple’s role. I think this is fundamentally the wrong way to think about things, but even if you want to think this way, how is it better if Ripple feels more pressure to sell more XRP if the price drops? Wouldn't you think other sources of income reduce this pressure? — David 'JoelKatz' Schwartz (@JoelKatz) November 22, 2025 Reducing Dependence on XRP Sales Ripple CTO David Schwartz recently addressed how the company could lessen its reliance on XRP sales. During a community discussion, he emphasized that the key lies in establishing alternative revenue streams. By generating sufficient income from operations outside of XRP liquidations, Ripple would no longer need to sell tokens to fund its activities. Schwartz’s comments came in response to concerns that Ripple’s stablecoin, RLUSD, could shift the company’s focus away from XRP. A community member suggested that because RLUSD is backed one-to-one by U.S. dollars, Ripple could rely on it for liquidity, thereby reducing its need to sell XRP, particularly if the token’s market price dropped sharply. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Schwartz rejected the notion that RLUSD could replace XRP in Ripple’s operational strategy. Instead, he highlighted that developing new income sources, such as expanding payment services, licensing blockchain solutions, and supporting institutional adoption, would provide a more sustainable solution. This approach would naturally diminish the company’s reliance on selling XRP while maintaining its commitment to the token’s ecosystem. Investor Implications For XRP holders, Schwartz’s remarks signal a potential shift in the company’s strategy that could ease market pressures from ongoing token sales. If Ripple successfully diversifies revenue sources, the market may experience less volatility linked to routine XRP liquidation. Overall, while XRP sales remain part of Ripple’s operational framework, the executive insight underscores a pathway toward reduced dependence on these sales. By focusing on long-term business growth and alternative revenue models, Ripple could better balance operational funding with market stability, potentially benefiting both the company and XRP investors. Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

Market attention often follows price movements, but some developments unfold away from daily charts. A tweet from crypto enthusiast X Finance Bull draws focus to what is described as a subtle yet meaningful change within the XRP ecosystem. Instead of highlighting short-term trading activity, the commentary centers on infrastructure building, validator participation, and liquidity commitments tied to Evernorth, an institutional digital asset treasury company positioning itself around XRP. The message emphasizes that institutional involvement rarely begins with public excitement. It often starts with foundational steps that indicate long-term intent. In this case, Evernorth is portrayed not as an entity seeking quick returns, but as one aligning its operations with the core mechanics that support sustained network activity. The $XRP Quiet Shift Few Are Watching 🚨👇 Institutional adoption doesn’t start loud. It starts with infra, validators, and real liquidity commitments. Just like Evernorth is doing. They’re not just buying $XRP, they’re building with it: adding yield protocols, running nodes,… https://t.co/noOLD85Gy8 pic.twitter.com/OoGC34qZin — X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) December 23, 2025 Building, Not Just Holding According to the post, Evernorth’s approach goes beyond acquiring XRP for balance sheet exposure. The company is presented as actively developing yield strategies, operating nodes, and strengthening order books. These actions suggest a commitment to being part of the operational fabric of the ecosystem rather than remaining a passive holder. X Finance Bull highlights a form of institutional participation focused on durability. Yield protocols, liquidity provisioning, and validator roles are typically associated with entities that expect to remain engaged over extended periods. The implication is that such involvement embeds XRP deeper into institutional workflows, reinforcing its role in treasury management and market infrastructure. By stressing that this is not a fund attempting to benefit from short-term market cycles, the commentary positions Evernorth as signaling intent rather than speculation. The idea advanced is that value is moving quietly, with positioning taking place before broader regulatory or market changes draw wider attention. David Schwartz on Evernorth’s Role The video attached to the post features remarks from Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, who describes Evernorth as a new institutional participant focused specifically on XRP. He explains that the company is backed by major industry names, including SBI, Ripple, Pantera, and Kraken, and that it is raising capital primarily to purchase XRP on the open market as part of a dedicated institutional treasury strategy. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 Schwartz notes that Evernorth is actively managing its holdings through yield generation and capital market activities, while also planning to participate directly in the network as a validator. He adds that the firm intends to provision liquidity and integrate with decentralized finance protocols, including those connected to RLUSD, reinforcing the view that Evernorth aims to contribute operationally rather than only financially. He further states that the company is expected to explore solutions within the XRP Ledger ecosystem to generate yield, making it a participant seeking practical use cases rather than merely reallocating capital. The post concludes by classifying Evernorth’s activities as part of a broader migration of value happening away from public attention. It suggests that institutions positioning themselves now may be preparing for future shifts in market structure and regulatory clarity. Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News