Prix de AaveAAVE

The cryptocurrency projects that generated the highest revenue in the last 30 days have been announced. According to the data, stablecoin issuers, layer-1 blockchains, and derivatives trading platforms showed a significant advantage in terms of revenue. While some projects saw a decrease in revenue, a limited number of protocols stood out with strong increases. Here are the cryptocurrency protocols that generated the most revenue in the last 30 days, and the change in their revenue compared to the previous month: Tether (USDT) – $435.4 million (-1.5%) Circle (USDC) – $208.6 million (-2.2%) Tron (TRX) – $203.6 million (-4.0%) Hyperliquid (HYPE) – $61.1 million (-33.9%) Sky (SKY) – $25.3 million (+86.0%) pump.fun (PUMP) – $22.6 million (-13.5%) PancakeSwap (CAKE) – $20.8 million (-34.3%) Ethereum (ENA) – $20.0 million (-33.1%) Axiom Trade – $18.2 million (-11.7%) Phantom – $9.1 million (-20.3%) Aave (AAVE) – $8.7 million (-32.3%) Aethir (ATH) – $7.2 million (-13.3%) Aerodrome (AERO) – $6.8 million (-39.4%) Lido Finance (LDO) – $5.9 million (-14.6%) Chainlink (LINK) – $4.7 million (+6.4%) Related News What's the Latest on Bitcoin (BTC)? What Are the Big Whales Doing? Analysis Firm Takes a Deep Dive The data shows that stablecoin models based on interest-bearing reserves (Tether, Circle) maintain their lead in revenue generation. Layer-1 networks with high transaction volumes, such as Tron, are strongly positioned, while Hyperliquid and some DEXs are experiencing revenue declines. *This is not investment advice. Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!

The AAVE price has been under steady pressure. The token is down nearly 5% over the past 24 hours and more than 18% over the past seven days. That weakness has played out alongside ongoing DAO governance disputes and renewed sell-off fears. On the surface, this looks like a distribution. Exchange balances are rising, and sentiment has cooled. But under the hood, something does not line up. While supply is moving toward exchanges, large holders have quietly stepped in, treating the sell-off as an entry point rather than an exit. The question now is simple. What bullish setup are whales positioning for while the market focuses on governance risk? Exchange Supply Rises as Governance Pressure Lingers Aaves sell-off did not appear out of nowhere. Governance tensions have been building for weeks, creating uncertainty around revenue flows and DAO control. That uncertainty has shown up clearly in on-chain supply data. 🚨 @aave is having a full blown civil warAnd it might be the biggest governance fight defi has ever seen.Heres a clean breakdown 👇Aave has two sides: Aave labs a centralised entity founded by stani Aave dao token holders who govern the protocolNow heres what pic.twitter.com/zFnhcN5vSc Observe (@obsrvgmi) December 22, 2025 Since December 16 (Poison Pill proposal day), AAVE supply on exchanges has climbed from roughly 1.22 million tokens to about 1.42 million tokens. That is an increase of nearly 200,000 AAVE, or roughly 16%, in just over a week. Aave DAO Faces Governance Clash Over Control of Aave Labs 👀An AAVE token holder has proposed a controversial poison pill strategy that would allow the Aave DAO to seize control of Aave Labs intellectual property, brand, and equity, effectively turning the company into a DAO pic.twitter.com/SC1gd1KYhs Karon (@pangestu_karon) December 18, 2025 Rising exchange balances usually signal potential selling pressure, and the price action confirms that concern, with AAVE sliding almost 18% over the same period. Exchange Balances Grow: Santiment Want more token insights like this?Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariyas Daily Crypto Newsletterhere. This shift is notable because it reverses what happened earlier in the month, on December 16. When Aaves regulatory overhang eased in mid-December, exchange balances dropped sharply as confidence improved. Now, with governance issues dragging on, supply has moved back toward exchanges, reinforcing near-term caution. On its own, this setup looks bearish. But the exchange supply is only one side of the market. Whales Buy the Dip as Sell-Off Fears Peak While exchange balances have increased, large holders have moved in the opposite direction. Over the past 24 hours, Aave whales increased their holdings by 12.63%, bringing their total stash to 183,987 AAVE. That implies fresh accumulation of roughly 20,600 tokens, worth about $3.1 million at current prices. At the same time, public figure wallets, which include verified funds and well-tracked entities, raised their holdings by 13.55%, lifting their balance to 274,652 AAVE. That increase represents roughly 32,700 tokens, or about $5 million. AAVE Whales: Nansen Combined, these two cohorts added more than 53,000 AAVE in a single day. At the current price, that is over $8 million accumulated directly into weakness. This divergence matters. When exchange supply rises, but whales accumulate, it often reflects short-term fear being absorbed by longer-term conviction. Instead of reacting to governance noise, large holders appear to be positioning around structure, not headlines. That brings us to the chart. The Bullish AAVE Price Trigger Whales Are Positioning For? The price action provides the missing link. AAVE has repeatedly defended the $147 zone, forming the head of a developing inverse head-and-shoulders pattern. This pattern typically signals a possible trend reversal after prolonged downside pressure, especially when it forms during elevated fear. The structure remains compressed under a descending neckline line, meaning sellers still control the broader trend. But the trigger is clear. A decisive move above $182 would begin to shift momentum. Clearing $193 would confirm the breakout and open upside toward $207, then $232, with $248 as the larger recovery target. AAVE Price Analysis: TradingView The risk is equally defined. If AAVE loses $147, the bullish structure breaks. That would likely invite renewed selling pressure, with downside risk toward $127. For now, whales appear to be betting that support holds, and structure resolves higher. Read the article at BeInCrypto

$AAVE is entering a governance conflict that has been building for years Not because the protocol is weak But because it is stronger than ever This is not about a hack It is about control The protocol today Aave is the largest lending protocol in crypto Around $33B in TVL More than $21B in active borrows It is now more than twenty times larger than Compound That scale is what made the dispute unavoidable The trigger In early December 2025 CoWSwap was integrated directly into Aave Swap fees were routed to an Aave Labs wallet Not to the DAO That decision exposed a question that had been avoided Who actually owns AAVE The unresolved question One view The DAO funded everything through the ICO The brand and revenue should belong to token holders The other view Aave Labs legally owns the brand and IP And has carried development through years of risk This disagreement existed for a long time It just was not public Governance escalation A proposal emerges to move the brand and IP to the DAO Another proposal pushes the issue to a Snapshot vote The conflict becomes explicit DAO versus Aave Labs Arguments from one side • Fees should benefit token holders • Private control creates conflicts • DAO sovereignty must be protected Arguments from the other • Legal structures are complex • Snapshot voting is too blunt • Poor timing risks Aave V4 and adoption • Labs kept the protocol alive through earlier cycles Market reaction During the debate A large holder exits About 230000 AAVE Roughly $38M The capital rotates into stETH and WBTC AAVE trades near $151 What happens next? The Snapshot vote ends December 26 The protocol will survive either outcome What changes is governance Whether AAVE becomes fully DAO controlled Or continues with hybrid power structures The open question is not if Aave endures It is what kind of protocol it becomes after this decision

The core asset of the Aave ecosystem, the AAVE coin, has witnessed a significant downturn over the past week, dropping by 18% and becoming the worst performer among the top 100 cryptocurrencies. While the broader market, including Bitcoin $87,539.61 and Ethereum $2,964.93, remained stable with limited gains, AAVE’s distinct trend has sparked concern. The volatility in its pricing is attributed to governance uncertainties surrounding the control of the protocol’s brand and communication channels. Contents Governance Crisis Pushing AAVE Behind in the Market Selling Pressure, Whales, and the Founder’s Purchases Governance Crisis Pushing AAVE Behind in the Market A governance dispute within Aave—a decentralized finance (DeFi) lending and borrowing protocol—has emerged as a key issue damaging investor perception. This debate, which became prominent last week, revolves around the management of the brand, domain names, and public communication channels. The dispute, unfolding mainly on forums and social media, has intensified concerns over coordination and decision-making processes. Despite overall market stability, AAVE is suffering from deeper value losses, indicating that sell-offs are driven more by protocol-specific risks than macroeconomic conditions. Selling Pressure, Whales, and the Founder’s Purchases According to data from Onchain Lens, a blockchain tracking service, a major investor sold approximately 230,000 AAVE coins in a short time span on Monday. The sale, valued at around $35 million at current prices, reportedly shifted towards Ethereum derivatives and Bitcoin, causing approximately a 10% drop intraday and raising volatility. The sales coincided with the governance proposal moving to a Snapshot vote, exacerbating the existing pressure. In contrast, blockchain tools linked wallets associated with Aave founder Stani Kulechov showing purchases during the decline. Reports suggest Kulechov accumulated roughly $12.6 million in AAVE over the last week at an average price of about $176, resulting in an unrealized loss of around $2.2 million with the price fall. Although founders’ acquisitions are often seen as confidence signals, they failed to offset the selling pressure. Bitcoin’s stability around $90,000 and the absence of similar declines in major cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and XRP suggest that investors are not exiting the crypto market altogether but instead reducing positions in protocols suffering internal uncertainties. The open-ended nature of these governance disputes, coupled with a lack of a clear resolution timetable, complicates the “brand and interface gateways” issue that encompasses Aave DAO’s power usage outside the blockchain.